Iconic log used for firewood

The Papamoa log that raised $150 for a local charity will now aid in keeping someone warm in winter.

A couple of forestry workers saw the log on the beach and thought it would make great firewood for their Nan.


The log being chopped up for firewood.

'I didn't know she was an icon. They should put a sign on it. How am I supposed to know?” says Nick Fielding.

'I think the tree is about 100 years old. You can tell by the grain of the tree. If they had a big sign on here I wouldn't have gone near it.”

A couple of pieces of the gum wood were cut off for firewood for Nick's 74-year-old Nan.

The log was put up for auction a couple of months ago by the Papamoa Facebook page administrator Rosalie Crawford, as a means of raising money for the Papamoa Food Bank.

Local businessman Yo Roberts won the auction with his $150 bid. Read more here.

When told about what happened to the log, Yo Roberts says it was news to him.

"I bought it for charity and if someone is going along and chopping it up for firewood, then it's a shame.

"It's completely water logged and won't make good firewood. It will take a year to dry out. I would have thought it was illegal for someone to go and do that."

Yo feels it is quite selfish for someone to go along and chop it up, whether it be for firewood or just plain vandalising it.

"It's ridiculous. It's a shame."

'I've seen it become a much photographed object with families and people going there to visit it and play around it,” says Rosalie.

'Last week one family posted that they'd travelled from Auckland to visit family and while here would visit the Papamoa Log. It had started to become a little bit of a local icon.”

Regional council senior planner Jo Noble says council bylaw only permits vehicles on the beach for specific purposes or if they're authorised by the authorities.

The taking of natural material from the foreshore and seabed is controlled by the Resource Management Act.

While the removal of a few shells or driftwood is not a concern, removing quantities of material to sell for a profit is.

'Also, if the method of removal is going to generate disturbance (for example using heavy machinery to remove the material) then a resource consent would be required,” confirms Jo.

Removing driftwood is a permitted activity in the regional Coastal Environment Plan and doesn't need a resource consent as long as vehicles are not used on the foreshore.

Tauranga City Council engineer Peter Mora says the men had stopped cutting by the time he got down there.

"Log is now cut in two so likely to mobilise on a storm tide and if it goes to sea again it will be a navigation hazard.

"I have some other logs at Harrisons Cut they can get which are dry and that might protect the sandbags from getting damaged with the smaller logs moving around in the drain channel."

You may also like....

21 comments

BLOODY THIEVES

Posted on 11-07-2015 11:29 | By Colleen Spiro

Not theirs to take..Should be prosecuted....


Dioxin Poisoning?

Posted on 11-07-2015 12:43 | By cssr

I thought that burning driftwood from the sea was a great source for producing dioxin. Burning it in a woodburner or metallic stove is a great idea too. Rusts them out. Luckily Nick's chainsaw is sharper than he is.


its a piece of wood

Posted on 11-07-2015 12:44 | By schmoo

who cares if they take it, plenty more trees out there


Presumably...

Posted on 11-07-2015 13:09 | By morepork

... the two guys who cut it up will repay Mr.Roberts his $150? It's the least they could do. While it is true there was no sign on it, they have a responsibility to establish that is OK to take it before taking it.


Icons of Our Age

Posted on 11-07-2015 13:41 | By space cadet

Iconic Log?? C'mon, a large piece of driftwood surely! Some guys come along and clean it up for firewood and do someone a good turn into the bargain and we have regulations for Africa to prosecute, persecute and punish these 'evildoers' and generally make their lives a misery. We need a wider perspective here!


Get a life

Posted on 11-07-2015 14:23 | By spencerb

It's only a log and what's more it's an eyesore.


Missing the point

Posted on 11-07-2015 16:47 | By J.J

The log belonged to no one to auction off on face book in the first place!


peasants n rules,

Posted on 11-07-2015 16:55 | By GregAKL

typical,absurd rules and fee gathering by useless rubber stamping bureaucrats, viva la revolution.


Dead tree

Posted on 11-07-2015 17:00 | By Homer

It's a large piece of driftwood for goodness sake, while large lumps of driftwood make great seats, recliners etc, they are still just driftwood. Some perspective is required here.


Wow

Posted on 11-07-2015 17:07 | By porky

who cares! Its a log on a beach. They werent to know that they couldnt take it. Iconic?! This is the first i have heard about it! How can someone sell something thats not theirs to sell, even if it was for charity? Maybe i could sell all the sanf on the beach for charity??!!!


Cool

Posted on 11-07-2015 18:30 | By Jimmy Ehu

they should be compensated for getting rid of it, what an inane thing to do anyway ..... auctioning a log!!!, well done lads very community minded , cleaning up our beaches.


Its bloody driftwood

Posted on 11-07-2015 20:25 | By The Caveman

On the beach. Good on the fellas that cut it up and took it away. Resource Management Act, need to get a permit to get rid of something that would have been removed 30 years ago (on a first up best dressed basis)- where is this country going !!!! The log was RUBBISH on the beach - if someone with a ute and a chainsaw wants to take it away AT NO COST TO THE RATEPAYER - take the blood thing . OH sorry that will put some council cretten out of a job trying to stop it being removed - Eh ..........


ICONIC LOG -NO ITS DRIFTWOOD

Posted on 12-07-2015 10:06 | By kellbell

Get a grip where is the problem here . While I don't think it is a great idea to venture onto any beach with a vehicle to saw up logs for firewood. The real thrust of the critics complaint is the log itself and how on earth would anyone know the history of it and what does it matter a ratz artz anyway.LOL


EYE SORE

Posted on 12-07-2015 14:57 | By YOGI BEAR

Thank god it has going ... gone, what a blessing. Cant see why the RMA has anything to do with this. The Kaveman/Kellbell are onto the hypocrisy of this, why does some Muppet in TCC need to think about anything outside the glass box they are housed in. All they touch becomes fools gold.


morepork

Posted on 12-07-2015 17:21 | By Kenworthlogger

You muppett. No one "owns" the log. They dont have to ask anyone if its ok to take driftwood. Do you ask someone is it ok to collect shells on the beach???


keep it in perspective

Posted on 13-07-2015 08:52 | By Annalist

For a start the whole auction ownership thing was just a bit of fun. No-one owns the log to sell, to keep or whatever. If someone wants to clear it then fine, or leave it as is, fine also. I would say though that burning driftwood in a grated fire isn't a good idea. The salt will rust through the grate fairly quickly.


Annalist

Posted on 15-07-2015 01:39 | By YOGI BEAR

yes agree, but the real issue is here that the "I want" mentality is kicking in, someone is worried about having missed out on something they never had.


wow

Posted on 15-07-2015 12:13 | By Fltbsh

its a $150 piece of wood. Get over it.. Find something real to complain about. Plenty more trees in the forest...


Fltbsh

Posted on 17-07-2015 00:09 | By YOGI BEAR

Agree, what a waste of time and space


iconic?

Posted on 21-07-2015 02:38 | By Kenworthlogger

I can see this log being as being far more famous than some statues on the strand...


Robins

Posted on 27-07-2015 19:05 | By Kenworthlogger

Robin will be able to bring his overseas visitors to see this famous log....


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.