Fears new housing will bring ‘trouble’

The homes would be the same design as these homes also built for transitional housing, at Luke Street in Auckland. Supplied photo.

Some Papamoa residents have raised concerns over the proposed transitional housing planned for the area.

On June 23, residents were sent a letter from Scott Gallacher, Deputy Chief Executive of Housing for the Ministry of Social Development, outlining plans by Housing NZ and MSD to develop new transitional housing on vacant land owned by Tauranga City Council at 45 Opal Drive, Papamoa.

The plans are for 19 new two- and three-bedroom homes to be onsite by late August. The site is currently vacant and part of it has been designated in the long-term for future use for affordable housing by TCC.

The letter outlines how the homes would be managed by an on-site provider, which would look after the properties and also provide support to the people living there. It states people living in the homes would be families and children who would be expected to stay in the houses for an average of 12 weeks or longer if required, while they are helped to secure housing that is more permanent.

The families would continue to receive support for a further three months once they move into more permanent accommodation such as social housing.

Included with the letter is a fact sheet showing what the houses would look like, and a fact sheet outlining how transitional housing programme works, with examples of other similar homes.

Residents expressed concern in the Papamoa Link Facebook group about who would be living in the transitional housing, for how long, and the impact on local schools and the neighbourhood.

Some residents agree with the sentiment expressed by Andrew Coogan that ‘we need to be doing more as a country and community to get children off the street and into suitable housing. At face value, this plan seems like a step in the right direction.' Another resident wrote ‘when we have mums and kids who are unable to find permanent accommodation and are sleeping in cars, we need to collectively step up as a community and act.'

Others feel differently.

'My concern is there will be short term tenants who need to be taught how to sustain a long term tenancy,” wrote Papamoa resident Andrea Kelly on June 27. 'What sort of people cannot sustain a long term tenancy? P addicts? Gangs? Trouble makers, bad parents and their misfit children, etc etc. Sounds harsh but I'm concerned about our community here. I'm concerned about adding to the pockets of trouble in Redditch Place/Opal/Topaz. This sort of housing unfortunately brings trouble, and in bulk. Just to add, I am all for good parents, genuine good people in need getting into housing, e.g. women in refuge, single mums. I am not happy about the transitional nature of the houses, bringing in the "dregs of society" into our community, our schools.”

A post that Andrea made in the Papamoa Link group asking for thoughts, concerns and opinions from home owners surrounding the proposed new development has resulted in over 500 comments.

'I live right by this spot and I'm feeling pretty chuffed Papamoa will be providing this for others. It's a good spot, everything is ten minutes' walk away,” wrote one.

'I think we all need a little more info on who they actually plan to put in these houses,” wrote another.

Bay of Plenty MP Todd Muller returned from Auckland on Thursday night following the request for a meeting with a group of nearby residents.

'In response to some of the resident's concerns, I went to meet them on Friday morning,” says Todd.

'I listened to their concerns and shared them back to the ministry and the council. I've pushed for a public community drop-in meeting to occur this coming week, and for it to be extended to a sufficient amount of time for people to be able to come in.”

Todd says the meeting location room will be confirmed on Monday morning, with the plan for the drop-in meeting to be held at the Papamoa Community Library centre on Wednesday July 5 in the afternoon and evening.

Tauranga City Councillor Leanne Brown says that since April 2017 the Ministry of Social Development Housing Unit has been developing a proposal for use of the Opal Drive site.

'Consistent with the approach followed by all developers, [MSD Housing Unit] have submitted a resource consent application to Tauranga City Council on the evening of June 23. The plans are for 19 new two and three-bedroom homes built to modern building and design standards. They would be landscaped to include play areas and plenty of green space.

'Tauranga City Council is currently processing this resource consent application. It is anticipated that a decision will be made within the statutory 20 working days, but this is a work in progress. The processing of the application will reveal whether it is to be notified or not.”

Leanne says that people with alcohol, substance or drug dependency, or people who have demonstrated previous anti-social behaviour would not qualify to access Opal Drive homes.

'Just to clarify, this won't be a facility for mental health or drug addiction treatment,” says Todd. 'What we are talking about is modular housing that will help local families who are struggling to find permanent accommodation. From my perspective as the local MP, having mums and kids sleeping in cars isn't acceptable and I'm pleased the government is responding to our communities needs and delivering housing.”

Andrea argues it hasn't been thought through properly.

'Leaving vulnerable displaced people to move into these transitional short term homes, to start to make local connections with schools, the community and local support services, only to then be moved on to yet another community and services, as the rentals around here are affordable to many now. That is unfair on the parents and children and actually adding to their stress, and the children's sense of trust and security which impacts on their mental health.

'The problem is the way this had been handled and the lack of info. The drop in info day on Wednesday will hopefully help with that, but unfortunately there will only be representative of MSD and council there to explain the process, not the decision makers. A lot of people feel railroaded.”

Transitional Housing

The fact sheet included with the letter to Papamoa residents outlines how transitional housing is a new approach to housing, providing warm, secure short-term accommodation for people in need – along with tailored social support while they're there.

Transitional housing is not the same as emergency housing or the emergency housing special needs grant. The emergency housing special needs grant is a one-off grant to cover immediate housing costs for a period of seven days.

Families and individuals stay in transitional housing for an average of 12 weeks or more while their needs are assessed and longer term housing is organised.

During that time, social support is provided to address issues they may face and to develop their skills to secure and sustain a long-term tenancy

The government anticipates there will be more than 2000 transitional housing places across New Zealand by the end of the year.

These places are in Auckland and other cities and towns across New Zealand including Hamilton, Tauranga, Rotorua, Napier and Hastings, Palmerston North, Wellington, Nelson, Blenheim, Christchurch and Dunedin.

Transitional housing is diverse. In some cases individual, stand-alone residential homes can be used for transitional housing. In other cases it may be larger developments, including former motels or purpose-built housing.

The government's investment in transitional housing is $354 million. People living in transitional housing pay rent of up to 25 per cent of their income, which is in line with income related rents for social housing. The balance is subsidised to providers by the government.

You may also like....

12 comments

I think I would have concerns also....

Posted on 02-07-2017 17:05 | By groutby

.... I do not live near the area at all, but certainly would give me reason to be a little worried at least. The likely occupants..."locals" it says,and that's great but they have difficulty finding accommodation now..why?..at an average of 12 weeks OR LONGER..?..longer?..If permanent accommodation was not available (and why would it be if it is either not available or prospective tenants are quite "unsuitable", then 12 weeks is probably minimum isn't it?. Many of the local residents probably have a fair share of local "issues" already, without adding to the situation, also many would have struggled hard, saved well and finally attained the purchase of their dreams in a very desirable area. There is need for "transitional" housing but maybe less sought after areas could be given priority for such developments, if it is too desirable, no-one will want nor make effort to leave surely?


HNZ

Posted on 02-07-2017 17:19 | By Capt_Kaveman

need to start building basic apartments for low income and close to amenities


Learn from history or repeat it !

Posted on 02-07-2017 19:14 | By Papamoaner

I appreciate that they mean well, but putting these houses all together in one place is a recipe for trouble. They need to be more widely dispersed individually throughout the community. The Walter Nash Labour government made a big mistake in the 1950's building ghettos of state houses on prime land, resulting in lower socio-economic communities and all that goes with it. I have sympathy for those nervous locals


I ask why

Posted on 02-07-2017 20:46 | By Merlin

Why has it come to this to need transitional housing for 12 weeks under this government probably because they sat on their hands to long before saying we had a problem(crisis) in housing and housing those in real need who could not afford the high rental rates.They can quote all the statistics they like but the increase in wages etc has not kept pace with the rent rises


PAPAMOANER

Posted on 03-07-2017 13:00 | By Colleen Spiro

Nash didn't make a mistake.....there are millions of families that came from State Homes, whom were given the chance to have a great life, and many have gone on to do great things.....I had the BEST childhood, growing up in Gate Pa. The problem is that the homes have never been maintained, some tenants don't have pride in them because of this.The Govt received the rents, but put nothing back....I drive through Merivale, and I quite like the character of the homes, I know some of the people....Even a lick of paint on the fences, outside of the homes, would improve what others don't like about the LOOK.....For me, it is what is INSIDE the homes that Count.


@Colleen Spiro

Posted on 03-07-2017 15:47 | By Papamoaner

I agree with everything you have said, But you have completely mis-read or mis-understood my post. My comments were not related to the quality of those state houses nor their tenants. I merely said they should have been dispersed throughout the community, not all built together like a ghetto.


A Resident policeman

Posted on 03-07-2017 15:53 | By Mackka

.... would be a good idea too. I am inclined to agree with 'groutby' - glad I don't live anywhere near such a development.


I'd be concerned too

Posted on 03-07-2017 19:12 | By Tgaboy

The type of people that need this kind of help are loaded with social issues. Gang culture. Drug and alcohol issues. Unemployed. Kids without decent parenting. Anti-social values. All goes towards a lowering of the neighbourhood. Let's be honest here. I wouldn't want that in my neighbourhood either.


So, where do we put them?

Posted on 04-07-2017 08:56 | By R. Bell

Ten yrs ago we had a local issue along the same lines, right opposite my gate. A facility for drug and alcohol care, same arguments, same paranoia. Heated meetings the lot. Gangs, drug dealing, even prostitution, burglaries, you name it. Ten yrs down the track, still there doing a great job, not one issue in that time, none. Don't take my word for it, give me a call, I'll take you over there and introduce you to the real world.


R Bell, What's your phone number and ...

Posted on 05-07-2017 10:52 | By Murray.Guy

I've a few questions, a number of concerns. Tauranga City Councillor Leanne Brown says she (they) have been in discussion since April. Typical but disappointing she chose NOT to include the neighbours from the outset. Since when has the land been earmarked for 'affordable housing' as I don't recall any community consultation? Surely the investment in these 'temporary homes' might be better spent as 'permanent homes'? Many of the Housing NZ stock transferred to Accessible Housing have development potential and very quickly. Sounds like just another bureaucratic layer and expensive 'provider' to score votes with the unthinking and undermine democracy for the locals. AND R Bell, what's your phone number as I'd like to see for myself, and put a face to a name!


@Murray Guy

Posted on 05-07-2017 18:12 | By Papamoaner

Murray, it's curious the way you refuse to answer questions that might embarrass you, and disappear from threads when you are proved wrong, rather than face up to the debate at hand. Then you pop up on other threads large as life, like a big moth flitting from thread to thread, but with no staying power. More like a voyeur than a debater of any substance. Not good for your credibility image old chap. YOU HAVE UNFINISHED BUSINESS ON THE THREAD "museums in boxes"


Murray Guy, don't ring me I'll ring you.

Posted on 06-07-2017 08:48 | By R. Bell

My wife is not too happy about giving our phone number to the "world". doesn't bother me but she's not impressed with the insults her people endure in these columns, and prefers to ignore it all. I notice you don't attempt to answer the question. "Where do we put the them?"Nothing attempted so far seems to be working too well. Meanwhile disaffected people are still living in cars, vans, garages etc. I guess the old saying sums up it all up "I'm alright Jack". Robin Bell.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.