TEL sculpture questioned

It creeps into the line of sight, centre frame, directly over the crown of the steering wheel as you drive west along the Tauranga Eastern Link.

Tentacles of steel grasping at the sky and falling earthward again.


Regan Gentry – the sculptor and the pa. Photos: Bruce Barnard.

It's very illusory, very ground zero, just beyond Domain Road's ‘jumble junction', alongside the TEL toll road.

It's the Pa – a 130 metre long symbolic palisade, a stake wall, an artwork – New Zealand's largest public artwork.

And it is, according to the New Zealand Transport Agency, assisting to ‘create a sense of place'. That ‘place' is Papamoa.

It's impressive – an eye-grabber – but as with most good artworks there's love and hate and not too much in between. It is polarising people.

And putting art and aesthetics aside, some 'peeps from Paps” are questioning whether it's necessary, and whether the $200,000 could have been better spent and prioritised elsewhere.

Like inserting a stent in the clogged traffic artery at Bayfair corner – now instead of later.

'They should have gone with a surfboard,” says Bella Harris on the Papamoa Facebook page.

Does she mean like Paeroa's big brown fizzy bottle, like Te Puke's slice of kiwifruit, Ohakune's carrot and Gore's big fish?

Something iconic, something representative of the area's economy rather than the people who live there?

'Papamoa's Kiwiana alternative could have been a surfboard or a wave. But how feeble that expression would have been for stating who we are,” says Rosalie Crawford, who edits the Papamoa Facebook page.

'The Bay of Plenty had 18 waka land here and people from all over the world have settled in Papamoa.

'A pa says as much about our place as it does about a home where people are nurtured, nourished and build their lives. So the pa is totally appropriate.”

But not everyone's ready to buy in. Saje Jarvis reckons the money could have gone on something useful. 'Is this useful?”

'What does it do?” asks James Nottingham.

Eddie Bartle looked, didn't like and posted his opinion. 'What a waste of time, money and effort.”

'Retarded,” says Nick Ellliot.

Lori Hope says: 'Sh*te!!! How does that represent Papamoa?”.

Laura Mattison says: 'OMG, serious?” Dead serious Laura, and there'll be more.

When sculptor Regan Gentry has finished ‘the pa' he will build his ‘tumbleweed' – an eight-metre high ‘Spinifex', one of those can't kill dune grasses which flourish in, and roll around, Papamoa.

'The hardest part is that people are uninformed, they make snap judgements,” says Creative Tauranga chief executive Tracey Ruddick-Gudsell.

‘Hard' because the sculptor did considerable research before launching.

'If the critics examined the history of the area they would see the pa is very much part of the story of the Papamoa Hills. It is very apt.”

But ‘apt' to Bella would not have been 'something so hideous. I wouldn't call that a Pa or a landmark”.

Glen Marcus Fraser asks if we are going to get a huge ‘Welcome to Tauranga' sign. 'I certainly hope so!” And Dominic Koch would have liked a say. 'We really need to vote on this kind of thing.”

But Creative Tauranga points out the research, discussions and decisions were done, had and made collaboratively.

And it suggests what we really need to do is see it, consider it and give it time. We may love it, we may hate it; we may feel nothing.

'Art is meant to challenge us,” says Tracey. 'The pa is a little abstract, but you get the feel, it creates the chit-chat, the exchange of thoughts and feelings. One thing is for sure – it will be a point of difference for the region.”

Tracey makes the point that some art projects have been hated and then become loved and treasured – like ‘The Wind Wand', Len Lye's 45 metre kinetic sculpture in New Plymouth.

Tracey wants us to tune out of the noisy minority, the terminal complainers and listen to the positive. Like Scott Darrall.

'This sculpture looks awesome! Not wasting money at all.” And Megan Jayne, who saw ‘The Pa' for the first time yesterday. 'It looked amazing.”

And, of course, Tracey herself. 'The Pa and the Spinifex are going to be absolutely outstanding – Yay Tauranga.”

Final word to Regan – the sculptor himself.

'My artistic practice typically depicts the relationship of people to their environment and how this is acted out.”

It's a credo assisted by the fact the pa is made from roadside safety guard rails and timber recycled from Tauranga's Coronation Pier. The pa is of us, about us and for us.

You may also like....

68 comments

OMG

Posted on 01-05-2015 08:47 | By Merlin

Yuk


Sculpture

Posted on 01-05-2015 09:04 | By MaureenR

I drove past this last weekend and wondered what it was, Asked my partner if he knew and he said he thought it was part of the blow carts...so there you go we both didnt know what it was for...I dont think it art and thats just my opinion..


Any use?

Posted on 01-05-2015 10:15 | By YOGI BEAR

If it had a lid on it and a stairway then one could get a little closer to heaven I guess?


Tsumani

Posted on 01-05-2015 10:17 | By YOGI BEAR

Perhaps a lid and stairway would mean that there was somewhere to run to so as to escape the Tsumani's? Would not seem to have any other use, purpose or meaning, when are the putting up the signs?


Utter rot, Tracey

Posted on 01-05-2015 10:25 | By nerak

art is meant to be enjoyed, not to present a challenge! The mind boggles as to how you can talk of Len Lye and his great work in the same league as this heap of cr... The two are poles(!) apart. Just who did all that collaboration? No one asked me! It's an eyesore, pure and simple.


PAhh!!

Posted on 01-05-2015 11:00 | By Me again

Sticking a rod in the ground pointing to who knows where is ridiculous to call it the pa. Maybe wind chimes, one suggestion, fishing rods.....


Improvement?

Posted on 01-05-2015 11:06 | By YOGI BEAR

Perhaps it would look a lot better if a row of billboards was attached, at least then there would be some use for it.


So the PA was built on the swamp ?

Posted on 01-05-2015 11:38 | By ROCCO

When I drove past the thingee earlier this week and saw it rising up out of the ground I thought it was the steel rubbish dumped from the trashed overpass or railway lines that had been pulled up and dumped in a heap.Ms Ruddicks assessment is unadulterated claptrap typical Creative Tauranga speakfink.How much did this monstrousity cost and who commissioned and paid for this garbage.


Surplus

Posted on 01-05-2015 11:50 | By Merlin

It looks like there was a surplus of the road barriers they place on the side of the road and it is.How on earth are visitors going to relate to this I do not know.You can relate to the sculptures in places like Ohakune,Turang,Te Puke.


Hmmmmm.....

Posted on 01-05-2015 11:58 | By spreadmaster

Each to their own, but I think it looks more like an interpretation of stonehenge or Noahs Ark than a Pa site. As for the money you will always get your knockers stating it would be better spent elsewhere.


Stop moaning

Posted on 01-05-2015 12:17 | By The Tomahawk Kid

If it was money TAKEN from people (government money) then the people it was taken from should have a say in how it is spent (not that I agree they should take it in the first place) - HOWEVER if it was PRIVATE money that paid for it, then they can do whatever the hell they want. If you don't like it simply STOP giving government your permission to take it in the first place (vote for a party that doesnt condone this). If you are guilty of doing this I say STOP MOANING - its your fault.


Community a soft touch for plucking?

Posted on 01-05-2015 12:42 | By BullShtAlert

This piece to me reflects the gullibility and stupidity of us public in compulsorily funding art in the first place. There is no place for government or council money in the arts. True art survives and flourishes on its own merits. Clearly us tax and ratepayers are just waiting to be plucked. Tauranga's new public art policy will help with the plucking methinks.


Rastus

Posted on 01-05-2015 12:55 | By rastus

While I am well aware that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I venture to say that if you took a poll I think you would find that most would have preferred to have seen an actual Pa, not some wanna be's interpretation of what a Pa should look like - what an absolute insult to Maori - Also comments from the totally discredited (so called) 'Creative Tauranga' are an absolute waste of time since their superior knowledge of all things arty have to be seen to be believed!


Not representative

Posted on 01-05-2015 13:06 | By DanielT

the articles says that people from all over the world have settled here. How many of them does a pa represent? Not many. Maybe the money could have been spent on finishing the road quicker, and put an end to month after month of slow limits and road works.


What?!

Posted on 01-05-2015 13:22 | By vandoo

What was he thinking?! What an embarrassment for Tauranga/Papamoa. The rest of the country will have a good laugh when they get a look at that.


Sculpture Brilliant

Posted on 01-05-2015 15:01 | By spikeredmires

Hi I think its fantastic. I remember when the Angel of the North was erected in the North of England there was complaints, like ugly, spoils the scenery , who's dumb idea was this and so it went on. Today it is recognised as the gateway to the North and if you asked anybody should it be removed? Your life would be in your hands.


$$$

Posted on 01-05-2015 16:23 | By Calm Gully

Funny priority??? How can it possible cost $200,000. Looks like there was more work installing that, than building the road. To me this sort of ART needs to be donated to promote the artist, not waste money that can be used elsewhere? Was a Pa ever made of that material. How does it represent the people? Strange! It is also very distracting, especially at the moment, trying to work out the road. I question these kind of decisions.


What a waste of money

Posted on 01-05-2015 17:28 | By Ann42

What were they thinking off, Steptoe and Son???


Maybe

Posted on 01-05-2015 17:56 | By nerak

Regan could set up a booth somewhere nearby, where people could stop off to enter their guess as to what it is. I'm sure he could fund a healthy prize from his earnings on this, um, thing.


What a waste

Posted on 01-05-2015 18:18 | By s83cruiser

of good Armco Barrier In a hideous Sculpture. Well It's only sculpture in the eyes of the artist. The barrier would have been better used to separate the traffic on the new highway rather than the absolutely deadly CHEESE CUTTER wire barriers that have been used. If a motorcyclist has an off and gets tangled up in the wire barriers the result is at best extreme mutilation from the wires and worst case gets chopped into slices by the wires and finishes up extremely dead. But hey they are only greasy motorbike riders so really who gives a rats.....We have a hideous sculpture to look at which has to be better doesn't it ????


Good God

Posted on 01-05-2015 20:53 | By Jitter

Were ratepayers consulted on the design ? I don't think so. What do local Maori think of what is supposed to represent their ancestors ? What about all the other cultures now in the Bay of Plenty ? When under construction we thought it was the frame works for a new building. The local people should be insulted by this sort of rubbish. I'm not surprised at this as Tracy Ruddick- Gudsell was involved. She hasn't got a clue as to what people want and like. Who did she consult with ? Sounds like they were like minded people who made the decision and wasted that money. Where will this artistic idiocy ever end ?


Disgusting!

Posted on 01-05-2015 21:31 | By monty1212

Utter rubbish! What a waste of taxpayers money.


ART

Posted on 01-05-2015 21:59 | By sambro

THIS IS NOT !!!


Terminal Complainers

Posted on 01-05-2015 23:33 | By Colleen Spiro

NZTA told myself and three other neighbours that they had NO money to relocate us into a like for like situation when taking our homes for the Welcome Bay tunnel. We ended up having to take 50,000 $ loans on freehold home, never thinking we would be handing debts to our families upon entering retirement. This art is an affront to us. It could have relocated us without debt. I will continue to moan about the way the NZTA treat people under the guise of the Public Works Act. The Actt needs to be changed as to not put the burden upon the people these infrastructures place on the people the affect the most. This will happen more often. People first. Art later.


sculptor??

Posted on 02-05-2015 07:43 | By Me again

Which planet does this sculptor come from Maybe it would have been better to have drag that plastic fantastic vaka (sorry, ) Waka down here and plonked it on there Open it up for cafe Premo!!Then you can reminisce about the Papamoa pa's over a cup of coffee NOT!!!


A BLOT ON THE LANDSCAPE

Posted on 02-05-2015 09:51 | By kellbell

Its a creepy obtrusive austere mangled heap of metal.The rationale for the thing is culturally flawed and it has now become obvious why this aberration was commissioned and constructed in the first place.The alleged cost of $200k is obscene and a total misspend of public money.Whoever floated it initially NZTA ,maori interests or someone else?? WOFTAM


What a load of crap

Posted on 02-05-2015 12:06 | By astex

Someone mentioned earlier the New Plymouth wind wand which is STILL a big joke to the people there but now papamoa has an even bigger joke.


Have a Cry

Posted on 02-05-2015 13:51 | By Impervious

To all the nay-sayers, I have one question: what would you do yourselves? Another rendition of the mount in a sculptural metallic form? Or, perhaps, a giant statue of Winston Peters, nay, Simon Bridges?? These comments reflect the close minded bigotry of the population of Tauranga. A pa not being relevant to Papamoa? Appalling! Good thing none of you had any say. Hee Hee. How exciting that the LTA has the foresight and integrity to encourage and support this internationally acclaimed contemporary artist. Perhaps Tauranga can now be famed for something more than homophobia.


Impervious

Posted on 02-05-2015 14:10 | By YOGI BEAR

Perhaps a little public input prior, here we see the thing happening before anyone particularly is even aware of it.


Yogi bear

Posted on 02-05-2015 15:36 | By Impervious

How about "public input" on how you do your work yogi bear? It's an artists work in a public space; not a public artwork in a public space.


Fence it off and throw a marquee over it

Posted on 02-05-2015 16:18 | By kellbell

@impervious you ask what would those who quite rightly think this is a piece of junk have done - the answer is nothing because nothing was required end of story.Saving megabucks for taxpayers and ratepayers.


Easy come easy go

Posted on 02-05-2015 16:37 | By kellbell

@impervious . Public input into private business is critical- if they don't like what you do then they walk with their feet and you go bust.In the public domain public input is ignored and aberrations like this are then lauded by those responsible some of whom end up on the honours list for insulting the publics intelligence.You refer to Tauranga homophobia go check the dictionary as you don't appear to know the meaning of the word.


HEAP OF RUBBISH

Posted on 02-05-2015 20:37 | By mike harman

I have been watching this ugly waste of money grow every day since it was started and it has become nothing but a blot on the landscape the sooner someone takes a chainsaw to it the better and as for Ms Ruddicks comments they are just as ridiculous as the eyesore.


Impervious

Posted on 03-05-2015 17:10 | By YOGI BEAR

Public money is paying for this behemoth crazed "artz" in disguise junk heap. Just for the one reason that it is public money and so not then a unquestioned right of self acclaimed artz fanatics and or ex-spurts to have a spend up on public land. Then claim the wonderments of the creativity. The only creativity here is how the money escaped the clutches of the taxpayers again without meaning or reason.


Impervious

Posted on 03-05-2015 17:14 | By YOGI BEAR

Check out the photo, the guy has got a grin a mile wide, you can not help but figure why, he has hit the jack pot on this one.


marque

Posted on 03-05-2015 17:16 | By YOGI BEAR

That maybe the saving grace for it. Not sure what use it will then be? Maybe best to fill it up with dirt, plant a few trees and forget it was ever there?


It could be...

Posted on 05-05-2015 10:12 | By penguin

...a symbol representing the number of serious crashes the area has had over the years.


Works of Art

Posted on 05-05-2015 11:23 | By Pamaxx

The purpose of art is to invoke a response, any response. It may be pleasure, horror, disgust, or even fear but true art must invoke a human response and this work certainly does that, so love it or hate it this work has artistic merit. Max Lewis, Mt Maunganui


Agreed max,

Posted on 05-05-2015 15:15 | By robin bell

my only complaint is its a wee bit too small.If the usual gaggle of garrulous grizzlers did the figures the actual cost is about 25c per head. Not a bad statement for that price. Robin Bell.


Agreed max,

Posted on 05-05-2015 15:15 | By robin bell

my only complaint is its a wee bit too small.If the usual gaggle of garrulous grizzlers did the figures the actual cost is about 25c per head. Not a bad statement for that price. Robin Bell.


Pamaxx

Posted on 05-05-2015 15:30 | By YOGI BEAR

Artistic merit? max, what a load of cobblers that is. There is merit in flying to the sun to see how hot it is, but I don't see to many keen on the idea. So if it is a melon looks like a melon, smells like a melon that means it is a melon right? But if you are a arty nut then somehow that becomes something good somehow?


REAMED OUT

Posted on 05-05-2015 18:49 | By CONDOR

C'mon Max get real.A reverse thread on the dingbell would be a good use for the materials and should get the PA out of the system.Should really have been constructed out of teatree and flax.


I like....

Posted on 06-05-2015 02:48 | By GreertonBoy

The guard rail.... I don't see the art in the scrap pile tho?


Common sense

Posted on 06-05-2015 13:56 | By YOGI BEAR

For Robin has long since left the room and long gone. The level of appreciation would appear to be inversely related to the ability to realistic, honest and upfront. That about explains it now doesn't Robin.


Ticks all the boxes,

Posted on 07-05-2015 11:08 | By robin bell

Big, bold,industrial,historical and modern all in one.All at a very reasonable cost. Since when has surfing defined Papamoa? there are more people walking their dogs,than surfers. Robin Bell.


Ticks all the boxes?

Posted on 08-05-2015 11:52 | By YOGI BEAR

Good one Robin, nice list, you forgot a few others and more important ones: meaningless, over the top cost, blight on skyline, egotistical nightmare, grotesque, no link to area, not artz at all, I am sure there are more but others can fill the gaps on that so you don't think it is just me all alone on this one.


Just one purpose

Posted on 08-05-2015 11:54 | By YOGI BEAR

When the leash is off Robin you will be able to race around and around the place, the barrier giving you a guide so as not to get lost. The real mission then will be the constant pit stops at each and every post, for the likes of you this will be a nightmare and the circular shape means no escape and no end of posts to attend.


Harsh criticism after the event

Posted on 09-05-2015 11:58 | By robin bell

is nothing but meaningless twaddle.YOGI BEAR indulges his cynicism in an endless barrage of ill temper.So what? it changes nothing and never will. Robin Bell.


Unrecognisable !

Posted on 10-05-2015 19:32 | By HillyWilly

The view that this piece of work somehow represents Papamoa could only be arrived at by someone with the IQ of a tadpole. It is, and will always be, unrecognisable industrial waste, and a target for graffiti. The minds boggles at the bullsh-- the Arty farty folks inflict on an unsuspecting public. Get rid of it!


We,

Posted on 11-05-2015 15:56 | By robin bell

writers, painters, sculptors,architects and passionate devotees of the hitherto untouched beauty of Papamoa, protest with all our strength, with all our indignation in the name of slighted Kiwi taste, against the erection of this useless and monstrous "Pa". Replace Papamoa with Paris. Kiwi with French and Pa with Eiffel Tower, and you have the opening paragraph of a petition to stop the erection of one of the worlds most iconic structures. Still there 125 yrs later. ENJOY !!!. Robin Bell.


Amazing

Posted on 14-05-2015 14:22 | By Jitter

So Robin Bell is now also an expert art critic. Is there nothing that he has no expertise in ? The latest piece to go up there is just as bad as the first. Spinafex ! I nearly ran off the road laughing. To think that anyone would pay good money for that rubbish.


Yea!! it works

Posted on 15-05-2015 11:01 | By robin bell

It made jitter laugh, we all know how difficult that is. As max said, art invokes emotion,good or bad is in the eye of the beholder.We are all art critics jitter,some are just better than others. Robin Bell.


Art fart

Posted on 16-05-2015 17:58 | By Feruno

This is not art . More like a pea fart .Whoever authorized this should pay for it themselves or lose their job .The PEOPLE hate it .


Where is Papamoa?

Posted on 17-05-2015 10:51 | By YOGI BEAR

Nothing to do with this, the mess erected is at best a "mound" without much solids. Papamoa is reasonably flat, muddy, damp and so on. A pond would have been nearer the mark. The only use for this grandiose edifice is to put a lid on it, a ladder and hope someone can make it there before the Tsunami gets them.


Very Innovative and Relevant

Posted on 19-05-2015 15:49 | By carpedeum

As a result of reading all these blogs - I took a drive out to see what they are all talking about. I WAS TOTALLY IMPRESSED WITH THE FACT THAT SOMEONE AT LAST HAS SHOWN A BIT OF INNOVATION,STYLE AND MATURITY which is what this region has been lacking for a long time. WELL DONE for these Public Art Pieces. I commend whoever had the BA##S to make this decision and actually did it.


carpedeum

Posted on 20-05-2015 11:31 | By YOGI BEAR

Sounds like you need to change your pills mate?


Innovation,style and maturity,

Posted on 20-05-2015 16:01 | By robin bell

well said carpedeum. You will have realised by now that ALL progress is opposed by Yogi bear,condor,jitter and co. We will soon be seeing more,but different art displayed on the Srand. Hairy and his mates. The POU at Gate Pa,The Pa at Papamoa, and Hairy on the Strand, we are getting there slowly but surely,methinks its yogi who will need pain relief before too long. Robin Bell.


Innovation,style and maturity?

Posted on 20-05-2015 23:21 | By YOGI BEAR

hey Robin, do let me know when you find them?


Your wrong Robin

Posted on 21-05-2015 07:45 | By Kenworthlogger

Im betting that if you ask them all about the road being constructed all will be happy with that. Most people dont like public money being wasted on art. Art is fine if you Robin would like to pay to see it in a private art gallery at your own cost.


MMMMM

Posted on 21-05-2015 11:37 | By peecee09

When are the slot cars arriving? Once the concept is explained one can appreciate the symbolism of the work.


Kenworthlogger

Posted on 21-05-2015 13:43 | By robin bell

Do I sense another call for another referendum coming? If you want a dull and boring place to live I suggest you try N. Korea or Siberia. Personally I'm quite happy the way things are.Road user charges are not tax, so no complaint from me. I guess years of looking at the inside of a truck cab has clouded your judgement a little. Keep smiling. Robin Bell.


Ummm Robin

Posted on 23-05-2015 20:39 | By Kenworthlogger

Road user charges are taxes as diesel fuel does not have the taxes included in them like petrol does.. When you drive a truck or any other vehicle you look out the windscreen mate not the inside of the vehicle... Nothing clouded about that...


Kenworthlogger

Posted on 24-05-2015 11:31 | By YOGI BEAR

Actually sitting in a truck cab provides a far better view of the world, certainly better than Robin appears to have. The clear impression is that Robin views the cost of art and who pays exactly the same as the nefarious Waitangi claims that he so vividly supports also. The perception here is that this is free loading, all arty types seem to think that it is their "right" to have everything that they want paid for by everyone else and can not understand why others have a problem with that.


Sorry Kenworthlogger

Posted on 24-05-2015 12:21 | By robin bell

but your wrong.AGAIN.Diesel does not include Road user charges in order to accommodate off road use primarily by Farmers. The only people who pay R.U.C are those who use roads, that's why you pay to register your vehicle,and that is why you have meters on your diesel trucks.Its not tax kenny its a levy,different things altogether.Keep Truckin' "mate" Robin Bell.


I dont think so Robin

Posted on 24-05-2015 20:06 | By Kenworthlogger

Forestry has more private roads or off highway than farming does mate. Name me just one farm bigger than Kaingaroa Forest? RUCs whether you call it a tax or a levy or a charge its all the same thing. Its revenue for the govt. the offical govt RUC website mentions all three names so i am absolutly correct. What any of this has to do with your Art you want everbody to pay for is beyond me.


Tunnel Vision,

Posted on 25-05-2015 11:18 | By robin bell

can be caused by many things kenny.Stress, long hours driving,prolonged exposure to air contaminants, extreme fear or panic attacks (yogi bear)many things.A levy is when we pay for the specific use of a resource. Tax is when everyone pays regardless of use. The relevance to this subject is that its not your money,or yogi bears. It's money paid for the use of.As for your analogy of forestry roads, you and I both know exemptions apply for off road use. Robin Bell.


Blue Carrots

Posted on 25-05-2015 17:50 | By Kenworthlogger

So i see you are you agreeing with me that levys charges and tax are all forms of revenue. Google levy and it says its a tax.


One last try

Posted on 26-05-2015 12:51 | By robin bell

then you get the last word.When you pay your toll on the new road,you pay a levy or charge.The only tax component is the g.s.t. if you are a business you can claim that back.All payment to gov't is revenue, but not all is tax. It's an age old debate but think of it this way. You buy a ticket to ride,that becomes revenue for the owner of the bus,train,etc. It's a charge or levy, not tax because you get to choose. Simple really. Robin Bell.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.