SmartGrowth 'short changed'

Tauranga city councillor John Robson is questioning conflicting messages surrounding the regional council's long term plan.

Bay of Plenty regional councillors John Cronin and Paula Thompson told city councillors recently that they are seeking public input concerning a number of serious issues that will affect the region's future.


SmartGrowth is credited with fast-tracking government projects like the TEL in the Western Bay.

But at the same meeting, in response to questions from John, they admitted that the council intends to slash its financial support of the strategic planning forum SmartGrowth by $200,000.

The cutback, which will see a drop from about $350,000 a year at present to $150,000, will take place in year two of the long term plan.

Smartgrowth is a joint venture between the Western BOP District Council, Tauranga City Council, BOP Regional Council, regional iwi and the New Zealand Transport Agency.

'If we really are trying to ensure the best investment of billions of dollars for significant periods of time, it doesn't make sense,” says John. 'If you are going to invest big money you have got to get your planning right.”

SmartGrowth's defenders, including the BOP Regional Council, rallied to back the collaborative planning approach late last year when Tauranga City council tried to break ranks over Bob Clarkson's land at Tauriko.

The SmartGrowth approach of working from the same population growth numbers and patterns is credited by the NZTA with being a deciding factor in obtaining government funding for projects like the second harbour bridge, the Tauranga Eastern Link, the Bayfair overpass and rail re-alignment.

'I honestly think there's some politics involved,” says John.

'I think there are some people in the city who don't support the concept, some who support it in part and are not happy with the execution, or where it sits in terms of ownership.

'The feeling I get on the ground from some people is though it is on the draft LTP, it is in a sense a bit of a provocation and they are looking to demonstrate its value.

'They are looking to get a reminder - a public reminder. At one level I think there is a game being played. And I think there are risks to it. I don't think SmartGrowth has full community support.

'And I think some people will take the regional council positon at face value whereas I get the feeling others would say the regional council position is an invitation to various partners to publicly express their support.”

If the regional council really wants to provoke comment about SmartGrowth, it could significantly increase funding, says john.

A past critic of some SmartGrowth decisions, John says he claimed in 2010 that SmartGrowth was under-funded.

'Smartgrowth is a spatial planning tool for a sub region,” he adds. 'There are literally billions of dollars riding on getting it right.”

He thinks SmartGrowth got some things wrong in its first iteration because it was not properly funded – and the local body politicians of the day had little understanding of things like strategy and planning.

'We still have people on council who don't agree with SmartGrowth,” says John. 'You can disagree with the decision that's made, but to disagree with strategic planning? It's a nonsense.

'Getting that planning right is important. If the planning goes wrong, the option isn't ‘let's do no planning' or ‘let's do less planning'. The option is ‘let's do better planning'.”

SmartGrowth is an amalgamated committee formed in 2004 to find solutions to rapid growth in the Western Bay of Plenty region, extending from Waihi Beach to Ōtamarākau.

It takes in 2289 km2, with all of the land within the administrative areas of Tauranga City and the Western Bay of Plenty District, including the regional council administrative area relating to the city and district and the relevant portion of the Coastal Marine Area.

SmartGrowth established a single growth blueprint, identified the future growth areas as well as the infrastructure and funding requirements to enable their development.

In 2013, SmartGrowth changed from a growth management plan into a spatial plan involving the community and harnessing the collective impact of local government, iwi, business, central government agencies, key industries and the community.

You may also like....

8 comments

Asking the questions

Posted on 06-03-2015 09:49 | By Fun in the Sun

it appears to me that John Robson has a habit of asking the hard and awkward questions. Keep it up John.


Support

Posted on 06-03-2015 12:11 | By Groj

John's comments that he may not agree with the decision but thoroughly supports the process is a good one. Smartgrowth is a fantastic tool for aligning multiple parties and is also viewed as a great communication conduit for industry. There have been a number of processes that have arisen including a regional aquaculture strategy, Forestry, Horticulture and the Freight and Logistics industry. These are well recognised by central government and have been held as a model for other regions to follow and from this has resulted in our region gaining additional funding. What concerns me is the save a penny lose a pound mentality that is appearing here. There is a methodology and process that is working really well. Risky way for councils to seek feedback!


Thanks John!

Posted on 06-03-2015 12:30 | By dstewart

You have highlighted the short term thinking of the Regional Council. Smart Growth is a groundbreaking organization in that not only population growth, population ageing and social aspects of growth is planned for but also work/life/play,future traffic densities and infrastructure are planned for thus avoiding problems in the future. If Auckland had had an organization such as Smart Growth twenty five years ago they would not have many of the congestion congestion problems they have now!


Rastus

Posted on 06-03-2015 12:41 | By rastus

At last someone else has seen through this nefarious UN outfit called 'Smart Growth' - These people need to be reminded that local problems first need local control and then once that has been satisfied then the knock on for national consideration can be taken up by our local MPs - not a pack of 'we know whats best' fatheads!


Planning for the Future

Posted on 06-03-2015 12:58 | By Frostbite

Growth is important,vital. Tauranga is making classic mistakes. planning all based around the motorcar. Developing residential estates further and further away from the city center driven by price. Housing needs to be viewed in a new way. Closer to peoples place of work Cycling,Public Transport and facilities close at hand need to be the focus. Having to get the car out to do the simplest of tasks ( Bread /Milk) is not the way future cities need to be Compact easy to move around and well designed multi story.People will say we don't want to live on top of each other. well in ten years time you may well be looking at an alternative to the car and you will blame the council for sprawling disconnected suburbs kilometers from work and activities that you wish to be part of. The american model we use is not our future.


Wisechief

Posted on 06-03-2015 13:58 | By Wise Chief

Its all about taking over what Maori once owned on both land and sea and possible even the air above and then via economic denial going forwards via constant imposition of new by-laws and costing via rates, increased levies etc Maori will be driven out of the area. This is very much same pattern as what happened in Ak after RC was established. Today AL has water board and other outfits which were under one banner and now split off into various fee gouging entities which if they follow UK trend will sooner or later be sold off to overseas corporations. The elderly and those who cannot afford to pay the constant increases going forwards will eventually through incrasing costs via rates and RC levies etc be force out of their homes and off farms etc. The whole system since 1810 uk invention is designed to steal the wealth.


let's do better planning

Posted on 06-03-2015 15:14 | By YOGI BEAR

Well that would be the idea but it is a very big ask from a Council funded appendage. John's comments and thoughts here are on the money, the accountability, accuracy and frivolous commentary ex Smartgrowth is breathtaking, that they remain in existence after that is only something RBOP seem to tolerate and remain in favour of. The failings of Smartgrowth have cost hundreds of millions and for decades to come will continue to do so. The TEL is a white elephant, these huge sums of money would have been better spent on SH29 and or SH2 maybe, or even better to double track the railway through tot eh Waikato.


Wisechief

Posted on 07-03-2015 08:06 | By Wise Chief

Smart growth has been blocking funding from predecessor of Callaghan, Ministry for Science and Technology & Foundation for Science & Technology & rerouting these funds via their regional representative agent who's with husband also run local business consultancy agency on the side. These funds have been directed to well known local firms and a number of recently arrived Pom and South African owned company's with Kiwi merely used as a face as is practice overseas. These are KIWI taxpayer funds heading offshore. Funding allocator's have no means of checking who real owners actually might be hiding in background. I know of a local Maori/Euro proven serial inventor who has on several occasions for decade now been blocked from access to funds to establish major export & job oriented projects of great economic and social benefit to local community and BOP/NZ. He already having global experience in establishing business offshore.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.