Amalgamation should be win-win

It does disappoint me that there are actually some people out there who seem to believe former elected members of council should basically lose the right to be able to express their personal views via letters to the editor.

I'm referring to Graeme Horsley's letter ‘Stand up for your region - don't be afraid' (The Weekend Sun, December 29) in regard to possible future local government amalgamation.
I would like to inform the correspondent that during the last 20 years I've written many letters to the papers and his criticism will not stop me from writing to express my views into the future.

It seems, at present, that the main people in favour of amalgamation is the development community, the Tauranga City Mayor Stuart Crosby, telling the media he wants to be the mayor of any Bay of Plenty super-council, and some business leaders.

But constantly I have said that the people living within any affected amalgamated areas should also have major input. Any future amalgamation should be a win-win situation for all communities affected. And there should also be areas of common interest and personally I have some difficulty accepting that there are great community similarities between say Tauranga City and Waihi Beach or Maketu.

Watch the orchestrated campaign that will occur during coming months but I repeat: ‘Be afraid'.

M Baker, Bethlehem.

You may also like....

3 comments

Master Baker

Posted on 16-01-2015 15:16 | By YOGI BEAR

It is with some amazement that I have to admit that you are on the right track here, what I can not understand is how you got to that place, your pedigree as clearly shown at TCC was to be the go-for lad at the front of the queue for your mate Crosby. I guess now as you are "out" in every sense of the word you have now done a 'turn-coat' on him. Actually that does mean that you at least belatedly are now doing the right thing, just can t figure out why?


Mike also off track and confused

Posted on 20-01-2015 09:57 | By Murray.Guy

Mike Baker recently wrote in the media that I was opposed to Wards which was totally false and obviously politically motivated. Wards add value to democratic processes, better ensuring (no guarantees however) that meaningful opportunity exists for residents to feel valued, more inclusive. In the same way the removal of Wards would detract from democracy, so would the amalgamation of local authorities where it is clearly identifiable that they are totally different in terms of culture and purpose. There is NO evidence that has been made public that supports the arguments put forward by the pro-amalgamation lobby in regards efficiencies, cost savings, community benefit. There is extensive evidence that confirms democracy is eroded, governance and staffing costs increase significantly and efficiency becomes an element of the past!


Amalgamation should be win-win

Posted on 22-01-2015 15:04 | By algail

With the debt the TCC carries right now causes me to very much doubt the TCCs ability to invest wisely. As for ambulation pshaw forget it. Why should councils that perform badly amalgamate and create a greater force of inability? How can amalgamation of inability make things any better. A friend called me this morning to let me know he has investigated building a house and council fees are now $30.000. Three cheers for amalgamation. If anyone sees this council or the prospect of amalgamation without an axe to grind being a good thing I would love to know where they get their super duper rose coloured spectacles from I would love a pair that makes things like the TCC debt and their less than excellent performance look good. Alastair Bethlehem


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.