Special housing a step nearer

City councillors have approved the next step in establishing Tauranga's first special housing area on land off Waihi Road.

The property, at 162 Waihi Road, is a former camping ground and has been vacant for about ten years.


The proposal to build at least 30 new houses has moved a step closer to becoming a reality.

The proposal is for PMP Developments Ltd, and Classic Builders Tauranga Ltd, to build at least 30 semi-detached/duplex dwelling units, with a mix of one and two storey designs and on-site car parking with one access only via Waihi Road.

Now it is council approved, the SHA will be recommended to the Minister of Housing in accordance with the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013. The units are expected to sell for around $350,000 and will be completed by July 2016.

Tauranga City Council is identified in the Act as a district with significant housing supply and affordability issues. The city council signed the Tauranga Housing Accord with the government in August this year.

There is no prescribed target in the Tauranga Housing Accord but all the proposed residential units will be smaller, medium density residential units, which by their nature will be at the more affordable end of the housing market.

Under normal circumstances the proposal would not be granted consent because it is non-complying. There will be one independent dwelling unit per 241m2 (gross site area) as opposed to one dwelling unit per 325m2 net site area as a permitted activity.

The development promotes more than 12 residential units from a private right of way. The outdoor living areas will be less than the prescribed minimum in the suburban residential zone of 50m2.

In all other respects the development is complying with the performance standards of the Suburban Residential Zone. PMP Ltd want the non-compliances approved as part of the declaration of a Special Housing Area, says environmental policy manager Andy Ralph.

Only 12 buildings are proposed on site, less than the quantity of freestanding residential homes that can be built on the site as of right. The developers have included an onsite park at the rear of the property.

Because it's a Special Housing Area the government has restricted objections to only the immediate neighbours. Concerns from Waihi Road residents about the impact the development will have on traffic are not counted says planner Andy.

Replying to councillors' questions he says perceived traffic issues are not enough to stop the project, though a slip lane may be required. Issues like building sound proofing, are Building Act requirements which will not be affected.

You may also like....

9 comments

Coro Street

Posted on 19-11-2014 10:11 | By YOGI BEAR

the geto concepts are about to arrive, it is difficult to see how these types of dwellings can be suitable for the aged or families with stairs and minor areas for outdoors activities. Will be interesting to see how it all unfolds.


Alleluiah

Posted on 19-11-2014 10:55 | By Johnney

Yes !!! They have finally got common sense. Great to see this type of development. Don't see traffic being an issue. Bring it on.


getover geto yogi bear

Posted on 19-11-2014 11:22 | By Johnney

Yogi Bear you need to get out of your cave and start travelling the world. These types of developments add vibrancy to a town.you are too quick to condemn this as a ghetto. Get a life and explore the world.


Wisechief

Posted on 19-11-2014 12:18 | By Wise Chief

I agree Coro-Street for with a planet getting hotter day by day inherent fireproofing is must have in a home, as is endurance & structural tenacity to withstand force 8 or more. We have readily available road transport making export import of superior types models of homes or other larger kitset fast to assemble products made of aerated lightweight concrete made either here or offshore using 3D Printers. Team will soon be able to make 10 homes a day increasing exponentially to over a 100 for export only as councils make it hard to be used here with monopolies like fletchers and cons resisting importation. We know our country is under a full blown fascist dictatorship deliberately causing homelessness to boost house prices simply because only 0.8 percent of all 66,000,000 acres of land called NZ is in anyway of form inhabited by a dwelling or shed.Aroha Nui.


Great start

Posted on 19-11-2014 13:25 | By Calm Gully

This sort of housing will be a great starting place for young buyers. They don't need huge outdoor areas while they are working hard to pay their 1st mortgage. Because the property is their own (not rented) they should be looked after. A good opportunity to step on the the housing ladder. Hopefully they will be owner occupied NOT bought up for investment! That is when the possibility of damage and communal car parking will be dangerous!


YES

Posted on 19-11-2014 15:18 | By Rate1

Agree with Johnney - these type of dwellings are common in cities overseas, but these will be built to (I'm sure) higher standards. A good stepping stone for first home buyers to get into the property market.


development model wrong

Posted on 19-11-2014 15:21 | By marshamaxw

I think that the commercial model for developing land is wrong,we need to end tract development and the profiteering off from it.It is not real economic growth.Everyone is talking about houses for workers but where are the jobs in Tauranga for them.The only people to benefit are the developers, maybe the construction industry which is a service/trades. We need export industries in Tauranga. This housing debate is beat up.The development I would favour would be concentrated housing and keeping the rest open as a common. People have bought into to this idea that they need a quarter acre but is outdated by fifty years. Enforcing class distinction and spatial mismatch as well as a range of social problems and pressure on more land succumbing to the same fate.


honestly

Posted on 20-11-2014 09:22 | By Johnney

Honestly marshamaxw do you think there are developers out there want to do something for nothing. You say the only people benefiting are developers. What about the first home buyers that now maybe afford a brand new house at an affordable level. Your view is so one eyed.I however agree the 1/4 acre dream is very much outdated.


Marshamaxw

Posted on 20-11-2014 10:39 | By BullShtAlert

Sounds like marshamaxw should do the development and run the city at the same time.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.