Bob’s housing vision remains

Bob Clarkson continues to pin his hopes of fast-tracking the development of his Tauriko land on the back of SmartGrowth, following Tauranga City Council's latest compromise.

Council's decision to rapidly rezone land currently in the Western Bay of Plenty's current SmartGrowth Settlement Pattern means the plan moves a step closer to being finalised, set down for the next SmartGrowth meeting on November 26.


Tauranga developer Bob Clarkson. Photo: File.

The decision also calls for a 'strategic assessment” of the wider Tauriko corridor.

In turn it revitalises Bob's vision of offering discounted housing after countless years of discussion and setbacks with local authorities.

Just last month Bob's request to have his Tauriko development declared a ‘Special Housing Area' under the affordable housing accord was knocked back by TCC.

He also complained that his land on both sides of the city/district council border at Tauriko has been overlooked by the SmartGrowth settlement plan.

'I am quite happy that most of the councillors and TTC showed some guts and a bit of flexibility, and they stepped on the toes of SmartGrowth a bit,” says Bob.

'They sorted it out and everybody is back on board with a compromise.

'There is a chance we might get some discounted houses with any luck in the next few years.”

Bob promises to discount 500 of the 2000 houses planned to be built on his block behind the Tauriko Service Station by 25 per cent, delivering a house and land package for about $310,000.

Initially 200 will be built and, subject to future state highway alignment options, this will increase to the 2000 mark.

He says there is a need for forward thinking integrated land use and transport planning, but the main frustration is the time that it takes.

He adds TCC's decision is a good compromise considering it recently broke ranks with its SmartGrowth partners to look at fast-tracking development land decisions outside the partnership.

Drawing the ire of the partners, both Western Bay Mayor Ross Paterson and Bay of Plenty Regional councillor Paula Thompson spoke to council yesterday about their grave concerns of operating outside the longstanding processes.

'If we only had a system where the urban limits were a bit more flexible and SmartGrowth was more nimble we could have led New Zealand in affordable houses,” says Bob.

'This is my dream - I'm a visionary. It [the decision] leaves that open and means I can do a bit more thinking now.”

You may also like....

21 comments

Go Bob !~

Posted on 18-11-2014 16:22 | By DAD

From reading comments on what sort of housing is going to be on offer, Bob is the only Developer prepared to offer more affordable homes that younger families can buy!


Compromise

Posted on 18-11-2014 16:28 | By YOGI BEAR

Yeah right ... TUI advert ... be reasonable do it my way. Look out TCC ratepayers there is about to be millions in bills dropping into TCC lap and no hope of anything back. We have seen this before and little chance of change.


Benefactors

Posted on 18-11-2014 16:31 | By socantor01

TCC needs to learn to never look a gift horse in the mouth. The councillors need to remember that they are in control and do not have to bow to the whims of the day as expressed by the paid town planners. It seems that Bob Clarkson's offer to build low-cost housing is the only true offer on the table. House buyers here are not all wealthy retirees from Auckland who must have ensuites, double internal-access garages, etc. What other builder will offer a package as good as this? And he will pay to install all of the services as well! C'mon TCC, see the light!


Developers visions?

Posted on 18-11-2014 16:40 | By BullShtAlert

Maybe I'm cynical but I'm thinking developers aim to get the most money out their development whether it is cheap or expensive houses. Of course if you buy rural land and can get council to re-zone it residential I guess you're laughing all the way to the bank. Get enough councillors on side and it's game on. I'm concerned that this developer contributed financially to a councillors election campaign. Doesn't seem right in my opinion.


affordable housing

Posted on 18-11-2014 17:00 | By dstewart

Affordable housing has safe walking & cycling routes to shops,schools and services.It should be part of the Age Friendly/Child Friendly city of the future and not on the outskirts where transport costs are an issue. Do not build a new development unless it can be incorporated into safe community.


Rezoning

Posted on 18-11-2014 18:22 | By Johnney

If council was smart they would re zone land around retail centres to high density. They did the exercise a few years ago by asking for submissions but only got the wrong answer from all the Nimby's. Don't keep spreading out. That's dumb!!!!


We

Posted on 18-11-2014 21:32 | By Capt_Kaveman

need to get back to having land, each section must be around 450-500sqm not 420 or 350 lets be realistic and not just a bunch of thieves, the land is not worth that much, lets say 2 sizes of 3brm homes eg 390-430sqm section smaller rooms 250-260k - larger rooms still 3 brm 440-520sqm 270-390k


Fast tracking

Posted on 19-11-2014 10:07 | By YOGI BEAR

All that is going to mean is that the usual long winded bureaucratic trail of paper is avoided and the land goes to market perhaps in 2-3 years not 10 years. The only benefit here to anyone is that the developer gets to sell sooner and make more money from it all.


Blatant self interest propoganda

Posted on 19-11-2014 12:19 | By ROCCO

This spin doctoring is a joke 200 or 500 homes out of 2000 homes is a pittance and even that won't be adhered to in the end. The housing will not be affordable and the flowery figures floated from time to time are all over the picnic.TCC do not pander to developers greed kick this B/S stuff into touch


Need minimum land size

Posted on 19-11-2014 12:25 | By YOGI BEAR

This low cost housing is not really anything meaningful, all it has become is "smaller" so the price can be reduced a little, nothing more than that.


Stop fantasising between the lines

Posted on 19-11-2014 14:04 | By chatter

Tauriko is currently where the industrial growth is. The lakes residential pricing is well outside that of new/young first home buyers. What Bob is offering is an affordable opportunity for first home buyers. There will be provisions put on the owners of these new homes that will stop any chance of profiteering in the first 5 years or so of ownership. I will give Bob my full support on what he is doing here, because my children and the children of my friends buying their 1st properties will be the ones that benefit.


Cloak and Dagger stuff here

Posted on 19-11-2014 16:32 | By YOGI BEAR

I have seen the proposal that he wants put in place, the young couples and families will not make anything out of this scheming, they will then be no better off in five years when they can sell to have more equity to buy a real house not a box type shelter.


3'6

Posted on 20-11-2014 10:33 | By YOGI BEAR

So I guess that at this rate that there will be a in massive immigration to Tauranga of Hobbits. That would mean that hey could be doubt stacked on each site as well. Hobbits available or not the result will be more shall we say "compact" housing in every sense of the word.


HOMES FOR HOBBITS

Posted on 20-11-2014 10:37 | By ROCCO

wants to be the land developer the homes constructor with 5 year buy back caveat. Sounds like a license to occupy in a rest home with all capital gains going to the creator. LOL


Environmental Piracy-Where are IWI ?

Posted on 21-11-2014 07:43 | By CONDOR

Sooner or later this development will impinge on the Wairoa River with large palaces for the rich either on the rivers edge or very near it with the possibility of disastrous environmental consequences. Surely local Maori with their conservation and environmental concerns should be on to this.


Hobbit Pools

Posted on 21-11-2014 17:52 | By YOGI BEAR

The problem with this land is that a fair bit of the stuff near the river will end up creating temporary swimming pools in the hobbit holes, this may not be seen as a desirable dwelling feature the brag about. Sandbagging may not help that much?


The system is not working

Posted on 22-11-2014 17:53 | By marshamaxw

We have seen this thing before.Our government insists the current financial system for to financing yourself homes is the best. Yet so owning your own home has become unaffordable for so many, proves otherwise.The Tauriko is too faraway from employment and services.and would create more traffic congestion, ensuring the need to build again.The model of building tract development does not give people variety and comes with it own social problems.It is only in the interests of the rich developers not the community's health.One developer who went bankrupt during the financial crisis was able to get TCC to not having to pay for the lien on parks his development by using the excuse the financial crisis had affected his project.It is ridiculous.


Urban renewal needed not more development

Posted on 23-11-2014 08:35 | By marshamaxw

I don't believe in any solution that is going to happen. The problem is social as well as cultural. We are perpetuating an antiquated style of development. That aligned to the interests of big business.The role as 'social engineers' in neocons are not so evident as the left but their message is just as dominating in the collective conscious.They use the structural/physical institutions such as banking and housing to instil and coerce people . People grow up accepting that owning a freehold home is the goal for entry for membership to society, debt is the necessity evil.Housing becomes no longer about a need instead it's a commodit.It becomes a race, where it is all about status, size and location being better.If we see these underlying thoughts, we would realise these projects are undesirable and unnecessary.All about social engineering using perception of inequality to condition minds.


Keep the

Posted on 03-12-2014 23:55 | By YOGI BEAR

Cos nothing is going to happen out there until the NZTA decide where they want to put SH 29.


Bob and TCC

Posted on 05-12-2014 11:54 | By firstperson

Agree with nearly all the above. Obviously there are a great many prople in Tauranga waking up to stupid Councils continually bowing to Bob Clarkson at the expense of common sense. Providing reasonable cost housing? Rubbish. If you have money, Councils sit up, especially this one. Sad.


Tax on real estate needed

Posted on 07-12-2014 00:07 | By marshamaxw

Overseas cities are going 'cubed'. The city needs to fund revenues so it funds services with a tax on property values by rezoning. Making the airspace available for more residential.Look at the Hancock Building in Michigan, 23,000 live and work in it. That is where the future is. In rural areas it is now rural, people live out lifestyles as part of a urbanisation outlook.The only difference is that of density. The real issue is between property owners and everyone else. Rob is offering an solution which is still inside of the financial model we have for funding housing which has failed. It is fact a concentrate more wealth into the rich, through the ratepayer paying to subsidise services. Not principally but instrumentally. Rob is the Pied Piper and if working with him creates too much public opposition, there are plenty of other developers with less political baggage.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.