Bureta’s Countdown opens its doors

The controversial Bureta supermarket that many people didn't want was officially opened today.

Mayor Stuart Crosby was on hand to open the new Countdown store this morning, along with three-year-old Wiremu le Comte, who is the face of the Countdown Kids Hospital appeal.

The face of Countdown Kids Hospital Appeal Wiremu Le Comte, 3, from Kawerau, store manager James Liddell and Mayor Stuart Crosby cutting the ribbon.

Work on the $20 million development began this year after the Environment Court gave Progressive Enterprises the green light to build the 4620m2 supermarket, retail shops, liquor store and associated on-site parking at the intersection of Vale Street and Bureta road.

The decision in September last year ended months of mediation talks after the council originally rejected the consent in November 2012, due to noncomplying land use activity and traffic issues potentially created by the proposed supermarket.

Demolition of the existing building began in January and the base foundation prepared for the new supermarket.

Wiremu was born with a congenital deformity (club foot) and has undergone seven extensive operations at his local Bay of Plenty Hospital. He is now a regular user of a monitoring system purchased with the funds from previous Countdown Kids Hospital Appeals.

Store manager James Liddell says the best part about putting a store together is opening it up.

'It's about having all the new customers come through and recognising the people who have helped put it together,” he says.

'Other than great prices, it's about bringing the community together. We have lots of students that work in our store. You can get a career - personally I came to Countdown straight out of school.”

James adds that Countdown is a really community-orientated business.

'The best part is the engagement with customers,” he says.

The first few shoppers arrie at the new Coutndown store.

You may also like....

16 comments

Hey Stuart

Posted on 04-11-2014 15:00 | By YOGI BEAR

When is the public consultation going to happen to build it?


A victory over busybodies

Posted on 04-11-2014 15:41 | By Annalist

Good to see that a supermarket has replaced a rather large pub. As for those against, and I doubt there were really that many, it's a sad day when there has to be consultation on whether a shop selling groceries can replace a pub selling alcohol. This supermarket will be good for the real locals, who can now walk to the shops, rather than use a car.


damn supermarkets

Posted on 04-11-2014 20:04 | By rotovend

I wish they had left the pub there, I went to alot of community fundraisers there and the food was reasonable.It wont be long before people just shop online and dont actually go to a supermarket. Oh and by the way CVountdown sells cheap alcohol and therefore is no different to a pub. Also the roads will be a nightmare around there dumb move. Oh and prices will just go up and up with a monopoly


@ rotovend

Posted on 05-11-2014 08:02 | By tabatha

Sorry you feel that way, but yesterday the traffic flow did not seem to bank up excessively. Yes we do live nearby, but closer than some of the objectors and unable to make a submission. Otumoetai a big area and now two supermarkets will spread the load. Some of the shoppers were from out of area, Welcome Bay, Avenues and Pyes Pa, they came to see the building etc. Expect it will all level out. I suspect rotovend you are a male, like me, but leave the shopping to her in doors. I share.


Annaklist, clarity over the MAIN concern, YOGI BEAR notes ...

Posted on 05-11-2014 09:17 | By Murray.Guy

The area was zoned Residential A. Prior to the Resource Management Act a community owned low level recreational bar and accommodation facility was established. By stealth, incrementally the use of the property changed along with ownership BUT not the residential zone. The issue for many was the manner in which the developers and Tauranga City Council staff appeared to have colluded to subvert the purpose, intent of the Local Government Act and Resource Consent Processes, which, in a nut shell, are about meaningful consultation to give greater and more direct community ownership of their local areas. I stress appear to have colluded as only a smattering of properties directly adjacent the development were consulted with staff citing 'LESS than minor' impacts which clearly is not the case. Whether the development should or should not have been built was NOT the primary concern, rather the processes TCC employed!


Totall Agree

Posted on 05-11-2014 10:05 | By The Caveman

with Murray Guy - it was the process used that must be called into question - Residential A to Commercial, with basically NO consultation with the surrounding residents.


Nitpicking nonsense

Posted on 05-11-2014 12:01 | By Annalist

So Murray Guy, how come several bars, huge restaurants, a bottle shop and huge carpark existed on a residential zone, but a supermarket couldn't? Surely this is nitpicking and busybodying of the highest order and a symptom of the bureaucratic nonsense that pervades this city? Reading back, about 100 neighbours got consulted. Just how many more were necessary? The reality is that one commercial business (supermarket) has replaced another commercial business. Big deal. By the way to call the Otumoetai Trust a low level bar is not right. It used to really hum with big big crowds and plenty of traffic specially on the big nights. As to how it got into private hands I'd be interested to know, but nothing to do with Council. Perhaps you could enlighten us.


Happy but Sad

Posted on 05-11-2014 12:09 | By banana choc chip muffins

A supermarket development that requires 265 carparks WILL require traffic safety and movement improvements. I am pleased to see a supermarket here to be honest but I think traffic improvements have been avoided to support the theory that the development effect is 'less than minor'. Agree with Murray Guy, was not handled well at all with next to no consultation.


@ Annalist

Posted on 05-11-2014 12:46 | By YOGI BEAR

The previous use was permitted on that land, a supermarket requires a change in zoning and that is what requires public consultation. In this instance Council staff hand in hand with the supermarket owners have circumvented all public consultation and basically just done what they wanted to regardless.


Something's Missing

Posted on 05-11-2014 14:32 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

Not a kiwi flag in sight.


I WON'T SHOP THERE

Posted on 05-11-2014 16:28 | By Ross01

Tcc and countdown have colluded to rip the heart out of the Otumoetai area, The "pub" provided restaurant, accommodation, function facilities, and in house private and public bars. To get similar services elsewhere one will have to travel away from Otumoetai , so while out of the area might as well buy groceries from a supermarket that visibly supports NZ activities (and NOT by adding $1 to grocery bills)


Boycott

Posted on 06-11-2014 10:21 | By Mary Faith

I will never set foot in the place!!! They broke every rule in getting it there and the majority of people were dead against it right from the beginning! Yes - the heart was ripped out of the community when the council sold the land that was held in Trust for the people of Otumoetai. MONEY MONEY MONEY again!!!!


sorry Mary Faith but you're wrong

Posted on 06-11-2014 11:11 | By Annalist

Mary Faith says council sold the land. That's completely wrong. Council did not own that land. It was owned by the local licencing trust and over the years eventually was sold to another trust or two and eventually to the supermarket. The council had nothing to do with the sale or ownership. The people I know who live in the area like the idea of walking to their supermarket and don't miss the boozing. They can still buy a bottle at the liquor store if they want. And yes, about 100 neighbours were consulted and that's a fact. I wonder how the busybody moaners would like it if they ever tried to develop something on their own property but someone living more than say 100 metres away could object. I think the anti-everything brigade would make ideal rule book clutching petty minded public servants.


Biased?

Posted on 06-11-2014 14:00 | By Ross01

Hey Annalist; you got shares in countdown or TCC? Can they really do wrong at all


@ Ross01

Posted on 07-11-2014 10:23 | By Annalist

Sorry to disappoint Ross01 but answering your question I haven't got shares in Countdown or TCC, but I have got a great interest in the truth. Not sure if that's important to you or not. It may be a new and thoughtful approach for you but try deciding whether council or whoever is right or wrong based on facts.


land sale

Posted on 03-12-2014 23:54 | By YOGI BEAR

Actually the land was not owned by TCC, so TCC could not have sold it. What has happened is that the land was owned by a community trust, to date no one seems to know what has happened to that trust or the money it got from the sale. Worth someone taking a look I am sure.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.