'Scaremongering' slows claim

Scaremongering by kiwifruit industry leaders is one of the chief reasons the Psa compensation claim against the government is on hold until next month.

That's the view of Matthew Hooton, spokesperson for the Kiwifruit Claim, who says the group is 'taking a breather” and plans to file papers with the High Court in November.

Kiwifruit Claim papers will now be filed with the High Court in November.

The legal documents were due to be filed last Friday and the deadline for growers to join the claim was tomorrow (October 24), but Matthew says that has now been extended to give growers more time to consider their options.

'Quite exceptional scaremongering has been coming from one or two Zespri directors and from NZKGI, and some of it has been quite personal,” claims Matthew.

'Claims have been made that if legal action was taken, the government would strip the industry of the Single Point of Entry status, would reduce funding for research and development in the kiwifruit industry and that Trade Minister Tim Groser would not represent the industry over access to markets.

'All of those claims are false.”

The claim seeks compensation for the effects of the bacterial disease Psa on kiwifruit growers and plans to hold Biosecurity NZ accountable for its negligence in allowing the 2010 outbreak.

The claim's legal team includes Alan Galbraith QC, Matthew Dunning QC and Parker & Associates. The class action is being supported by litigation funders, LPF Group Ltd.

Matthew says the strong reaction from the industry was unexpected, but despite that the claim has signed up growers who represent 15 per cent of the industry's gold crop, plus the only post-harvest operator to join the claim, Seeka.

'We are talking to a further 15 per cent of gold growers but have not heard from the remaining 70 per cent,” he says.

The plan now is to 'slow down” and lodge papers with the court next month, at which stage Matthew says the court is likely to set a time limit for other growers to join the claim.

He adds: 'Unlike in the USA, you have to be part of a claim in New Zealand in order to benefit from it.”

Neil Trebilco, president of New Zealand Kiwifruit Growers Inc, says its stance on the Kiwifruit Claim remains the same.

'We are advising growers to think very carefully before becoming part of the claim, but in the end the decision is up to growers,” he explains

NZKGI had obtained legal advice on the possibility of taking a case over the introduction of Psa but the opinions were that such a claim would face significant hurdles and the likelihood of success was not high, he says.

Neil adds: 'We need to bear in mind that like it or not, this industry is in partnership with government and the last thing you do to your partner is sue. For me suing a partner is a last resort.”

You may also like....

4 comments

Whose pocket Hooten?

Posted on 23-10-2014 13:13 | By Sam Green

Matthew Hooten is a spin doctor who is paid to make spurious claims. The question here is: Who is paying you today Matthew? This is a litigation facilitated by a corporate set up for the very purpose of making money. LPF have no interest in the public good. The other question is what are Seeka's motives for their corporate involvement. Hint. It's to do with the single desk. This is an ill advised claim pushed for financial agendas and not to benefit growers.


Justice

Posted on 24-10-2014 07:34 | By peecee09

If someone or some organisation performs an illegal act that results in massive financial losses they should be held accountable for those losses. No procrastinating and fluffing of the situation can be of any good to anyone. Let the courts decide not people who oppose for political reasons.


Someone

Posted on 24-10-2014 09:20 | By Capt_Kaveman

or a group are responsible for letting in the pollen and heads should roll and compo paid


Hold on a minute, who will pay?

Posted on 24-10-2014 10:57 | By Annalist

My guess it will be all of us taxpayers as it is we who fund government and its departments. I want proof of how the disease entered the country. Did any growers visit contaminated orchards overseas? Do they have any responsibility?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.