Cap taken off bottle stores

The removal of a cap on the number of off-licence stores allowed to be established in the Western Bay is being labelled 'a big learning curve” by all involved.

The Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority yesterday signed off the consent order to lift the current cap, mutually agreed upon by Tauranga City Council and Western Bay of Plenty District Council under the Local Alcohol Policy in September, 2013.


Sergeant Nigel McGlone.

Western Bay of Plenty Police alcohol harm reduction co-ordinator Sergeant Nigel McGlone says police have a neutral position on reverting back but feels all parties rushed into the restriction without proper research.

The cap had the number of bottle outlets at 74 in Tauranga, and 35 in the rest of the Bay of Plenty.

The U-turn comes after legal challenges from supermarket operators and bottle store chains to the joint council initiative and means future applications for new bottle stores can be decided without another existing outlet closing.

Nigel, stopping short of saying they jumped the gun, believes it is a big learning curve.

It wasn't until the restriction was set that councils started considering economic growth and community development, critical with the Bay of Plenty's growing population, he adds.

'If you put a cap on off licenses and where alcohol can be sold you are effectively putting the brakes on shopping centres and supermarkets.”

Under the Local Alcohol Policy, police are able to approve or reject new applications for off-licences on a case by case basis – something they have told councils they will continue.

This includes looking at the proposed location and what sort of implications a new bottle store in that area may, or may not, have in the community.

Nigel says based on police knowledge they can pinpoint how often officers are called to an area and if putting another bottle store there will reduce the amenity and good order, or increase alcohol-related harm.

Tauranga Safe City coordinator Mike Mills cannot comment on the cap removal, stating there are 'other elements” in the LAP being tested which need to be considered.

He says until the Alcohol Regulatory and Licensing Authority announces an indication on the use and applicability of a cap, parties involved are never going to know its legitimacy.

'Because obviously the reason for introducing the cap was to stop the wholesale proliferation of liquor outlets and provide some control mechanism around the number.

'Until it has been properly tested and decisions made as to its appropriateness either by council or the licensing authority I don't have much to say.”

The LAP was adopted last year after a survey was carried out between December 2012 and February 2013 to gather the community's view on issues including opening hours, location of licence premises, and the number of on and off licenced premises and a one-way door policy.

You may also like....

8 comments

Surprise Surprise!

Posted on 23-09-2014 16:18 | By Mary Faith

Yet another decision rushed through without proper due diligence having been exercised. An all too common fault with our councils. No doubt the "waka" debacle will follow suit. When will they ever learn ...WHEN WILL THEY EVER LEARN ??


learning curve

Posted on 23-09-2014 21:17 | By Capt_Kaveman

are they dumb or what, if i had my way what is aval now would be cut in half, none in super markets and dairys not open till after 11.30am no sales on sundays


Leave the cap!

Posted on 24-09-2014 09:37 | By thegoodlife

I agree Kaveman, take a leaf from some of Auckland's communities where supermarkets took the responsible step of not selling at all. Limit access and reduce alcohol harm!


viceroy

Posted on 24-09-2014 15:00 | By viceroy

What possible good can come out of so many bottle shops I thought the Council was supposed to show common sense in these matters apparently not more excuses for binge drinking


GRRR

Posted on 24-09-2014 15:50 | By maccachic

Why should I not have the convience of buying a bottle of wine with my groceries because there are people out there with issues. Stop wrapping people in cotton wool help those with issues and stop punish those of us with out. Its not like its a spontaneous purchase if you want alcohol you are going to purchase regardless if you have to drive 300m further (prob drunk)


BInge drinking? Sure...

Posted on 24-09-2014 16:16 | By Spacenight

If people are going to drink, they're going to buy it somewhere else anyway. Not everyone who drinks is a binge drinker so why ruin it for the responsible people? This is 2014 and commenters here are suggesting alcohol not be sold on Sunday? Are we trying to become a city in Tauranga or what?!


Missing The Point

Posted on 24-09-2014 17:03 | By austinz

Seems some are missing the point here. My reading of this story tells me there are still avenues available to question/object to the opening of 'new off licences' if the authorities enquire into applications and find that the opening of an off licence would cause more harm or lower the tone of an area. It's not carte blanche opening of new outlets. If the public and police and council have concerns then there seem to be mechanisms in place under the law to challenge an application.


update

Posted on 25-09-2014 08:08 | By Capt_Kaveman

wine i think many dont have a problem with at supermarkets 7 days a week, its the amount of stores out there to me is far to many, ask yourself a question "in any given day how many liquor stores do you go past?" and why would anyone need beer or spirits etc at 9am on any given day hence why a later opening time would be better, to change NZ's bad alcohol culture you need to change the way in how people have access


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.