Mitchell's by-election to cost $70K

Mount Maunganui and Papamoa residents face a six month wait until they will be able to vote to replace outgoing NZ First List MP Clayton Mitchell – at a cost of $70,000 to ratepayers.

Following Saturday's general election, in which NZ First won 8.85 per cent of the party vote, Clayton is headed to Wellington as one of the party's 11 MPs.


NZ First List MP Clayton Mitchell outside Tauranga City Council. Photo: Bruce Barnard.

As a result Clayton is giving up his Tauranga City councillor role after honouring a promise he made to the public after asking whether they think he should keep his council position if he ends up in Parliament.

The poll attracted 525 replies, 401 of which wanted Clayton to give up his council seat and focus solely on government if he's elected.

Tauranga City Mayor Stuart Crosby has wished Clayton well in his political aspirations, as he did when fellow Mount Maunganui-Papamoa Ward councillor Steve Morris threw his hat in the ring for National's Bay of Plenty candidate.

Today Stuart says once Clayton hands in his notice, which he is proposing to do once sworn in as a new MP, the necessary sequence of events for the $70,000 by-election will begin.

New MPs are expected to be sworn into Parliament on October 20 following a two week induction course on their new role. But Stuart doesn't expect a by-election will be hold until 2015.

'Rough time frames we expect because of the Christmas break the election will be held in March.”

He says to have Clayton in Wellington can only be good for Tauranga City.

'Along with Simon Bridges and Todd Muller advocating for us, only good things can come from that.”

The parliamentary promotion sees Clayton leave TCC after less than a year in the position as Mount Maunganui-Papamoa Ward councillor.

In October's local body elections Clayton won the ward with 4637 votes ahead of Steve Morris, with 4620, and former ward councillor David Stewart, with 3609.

Stuart is not sure who will put their hand up to replace Clayton and isn't ruling out former councillors Wayne Moultrie and David in what he believes could be a list of up to six candidates.

The departure leaves fellow ward councillor Steve as the sole Mount Maunganui-Papamoa councillor for at least six months.

'It's definitely a loss to the ward because Clayton was an effective voice for Mount Maunganui and Papamoa,” says Steve.

'We held very similar views on tsunami evacuation planning and other matters which are quite peculiar to the Mount and Papamoa.”

Steve believes the ward's voice will not be diminished in any way, citing at large councillor Rick Curach and the Mayor, who both live in the area as handy people to call on.

'I'm confident any argument that I raise won't be dealt with parochially by the rest of the council, just in the same way when issues are raised in other parts of the city I don't deal with it from a parochial point of view either.

'I think it's really important for Mount Maunganui and Papamoa that our next councillor is committed to working through tsunami evacuations, which we have already put money in the budget for.

'Also the financial discipline which this current council has been undertaking.”

You may also like....

42 comments

Parochial

Posted on 22-09-2014 11:36 | By Accountable

Steve Morris,you are the picture dictionaries description for the word parochial particularly when the issue of parking parity with the Mount is up for discussion.


Let's hope

Posted on 22-09-2014 11:49 | By The Sage

Let's hope Brendan Horan doesn't stand.He would have the cheek to do so.


Overit

Posted on 22-09-2014 12:48 | By overit

As I said in yesterdays comments-Clayton needs to cough up with some money here.


Bi election costs.

Posted on 22-09-2014 13:42 | By Kiri Upoko

Resignation effective immediately or will he be collecting council salary for the next six months ? Maybe that money should go towards bi-election costs.


Why?

Posted on 22-09-2014 13:48 | By sojourner

Why on earth should ratepayers foot that bill? He should do so himself since he is the one who decided to leave his post. Or maybe NZ1st.since they wanted him. Not the rate payers.


?

Posted on 22-09-2014 14:09 | By maccachic

Just pass it onto Steve Morris and save the $70k for the next Council election.


Clayton ...

Posted on 22-09-2014 14:19 | By chancer

you should pay for this by-election as you have broken your initial committment to serve the people of your ward and it is your choice to change career paths. Why should we ratepayers stump up to cover your whim to move into 'big boy politics' ?


By-election ??

Posted on 22-09-2014 14:22 | By myview

Why the cost of a by-election let's just have the highest polling candidate who missed out last election,it wasn't that long ago.


2nd place Steve Morris now has the job

Posted on 22-09-2014 14:30 | By rotovend

why dont we just put @nd place Steve Morris in the council position?? why on earth hold an election before one is due its not cost effective although people who change their mind should have to contribute towards covering the job they got and abandoned


Resignation

Posted on 22-09-2014 15:16 | By YOGI BEAR

I hope he does the right thing and attaches his cheque for $70,000 so as he does the right thing by ratepayers.


$70,000 bar tab

Posted on 22-09-2014 15:28 | By mykgold102

So Clayton wants to help Tauranga by leaving us with a $70,000 bill to pay for his ego and political aspirations? Congratulations Clayton, you are well on your way to becoming a true politician. Hows about paying your tab on the way out!


Cost

Posted on 22-09-2014 15:49 | By What now

I agree with By-election why not just use the next highest polling candidate if they are still available. Why should rate payers have to stand this cost.


Let Clayton Pay!

Posted on 22-09-2014 15:51 | By Mary Faith

Clayton obviously had aspirations to enter politics when he stood for council. Ratepayers should not have to pay for a by-election. If it is necessary then Clayton should pay for this himself!! To avoid a by-election the next highest polling candidate should be appointed to the vacancy. It is common sense after all!


Rastus

Posted on 22-09-2014 16:12 | By rastus

What a good idea 'my view' trouble is that it smacks of common sense and that would never do!


Congrats, but I think you should pay

Posted on 22-09-2014 17:05 | By BullShtAlert

Call me old fashioned but I think when you were elected as a councillor you were elected to a fulltime job for 3 years. Now that you have been elected as an MP you should pay for the $70,000 cost of the byelection. After all your MPs salary will be say $140,000 plus perks and overseas trips and I guess you get income from your business. Well done on getting in on a party list, but remember the cost of the byelection to the ratepayer and do your bit by paying please.


By Election

Posted on 22-09-2014 19:47 | By rosscoo

Because Council just like wasting our money.


Message is clear

Posted on 22-09-2014 21:51 | By nerak

Clayton, you should do the decent thing by your city, and foot the bill for the by election you have so selfishly caused. And you should resign from council immediately, as you do not deserve any more cash from the ratepayers. Have you no conscience? And perhaps a new mandate here, anyone who wishes to run for council should sign a declaration that they will not tip their hat at parliament for at least one term on council, and not stand for another term if they choose to aim higher. And Stuart is dreaming again, what makes him think another Tauranga-ite in parliament will be good for our city? Hasn't been that way over the last two terms.


CONTRACT

Posted on 22-09-2014 23:24 | By Colleen Spiro

When you are nominated and elected as a Councillor, you should have to sign a contract to commit to that position for the whole term....God forbid you should be serious about representing your constituents.. When it comes to politics, these guys seem extremely fickle.


Employment Contract

Posted on 23-09-2014 07:21 | By Spy

I would have thought Mitchells engagement contract would cover this eventuality. Crossman did the same in Te Puke last election, pulled plug early.


Clayton should pay

Posted on 23-09-2014 08:48 | By hapukafin

Council election wasnt that long ago.Clayton must have in his own mind that he had intention to stand for parliment and was covering his bet.If he thinks he is going to be a honest MP payup and ship out


Some of these comments are unbelievable

Posted on 23-09-2014 09:43 | By Annalist

Like the ones saying just pass it on to Steve Morris. Steve is already a councillor and is one of the 2 Mount representatives. The reality is that unless the law allows it, a byelection will have to be held and Council can't just appoint the next in line who may not want the job anyway. Clayton should pay the byelection cost and keep faith with ratepayers.


Have any of you

Posted on 23-09-2014 10:45 | By earlybird

resigned from a job before? If you have, did you think of paying your employer for the cost of advertising your job, interviewing and appointing the new worker? I'll bet not. This is no different, Clayton has resigned from one job and has obtained another. For goodness sake get over it and stop moaning.


@ earlybird

Posted on 23-09-2014 14:04 | By Paul Melhuish

I think you will find that there are many differences between what you are describing and the situation that Clayton is in. For a start, if you resign from a normal job the cost of finding someone new will not be $70,000. You have over simplified the issue just a tad.


earlybird is incorrect, not employees

Posted on 23-09-2014 14:52 | By Murray.Guy

Earlybird asks if any of those concerned about the cost of a by-election have ever resigned from a job and paid for the costs associated with their replacement. I can assure you, nice try but NOT relevant. An elected member is a contractor to the community, one who has said they WILL, if chosen, perform specific tasks on behalf of the community for which they will be reimbursed an agreed amount. It is a three year contract and a sworn agreement is signed. Should ANY other contractor (self employed)renege on a contract they would be expected to repay that already paid and likely meet costs associated with re-tendering. Elected members ARE NOT employees, there is NO redundancy, they pay their own ACC as self-employed folk. Clayton has made a deliberate choice to renege Morally, if not legally, Clayton should pay. His income more than doubles, position much the same!


@ Earlybird

Posted on 23-09-2014 15:15 | By Colleen Spiro

No different from resigning from ANY Job you reckon....BOLLOCKS....Clayton WON this job, because he promised to represent the people of Mount Maunganui and Papamoa in LOCAL Politics. He broke that promise and has left those people with a debt...Pay the debt Clayton and move on.


@ Earlybird

Posted on 23-09-2014 15:15 | By Colleen Spiro

No different from resigning from ANY Job you reckon....BOLLOCKS....Clayton WON this job, because he promised to represent the people of Mount Maunganui and Papamoa in LOCAL Politics. He broke that promise and has left those people with a debt...Pay the debt Clayton and move on.


@earlybird

Posted on 23-09-2014 16:03 | By Sambo Returns

yes I have, but while under that employ I never actively or in public sought out another employer, if I had I would not have got the chance to resign, that is a case of serious mis conduct, and as we have never seen his employment contract we will never know, and stop with the "crocodile tears".


Trim Council costs

Posted on 24-09-2014 11:51 | By The Sage

Get someone who knows what they are doing to come in and seriously trim Council costs. Start with Priority One. They should be first to go. This only mowing the parks and reserves every 3 weeks, instead of 2, is rubbish. They need SERIOUS trimming


Sage

Posted on 24-09-2014 15:33 | By YOGI BEAR

Add to that Tourism BOP, Smartgrowth "NOT" and Bay Venues also.


Koretake

Posted on 25-09-2014 08:01 | By Kiri Upoko

Waste of money waste of time, waste of space,


Kiri Upoko

Posted on 25-09-2014 14:19 | By YOGI BEAR

Yes, waste of time, space and money. But what you should be looking out for is the replacement, look for all the usual suspects to crawl out and parade in the by-election.


I'd like to see a Sunlive Poll

Posted on 25-09-2014 15:53 | By Annalist

Please do a readers poll on whether Clayton should pay the cost of the byelection. Just like the other poll about whether he should take remain both councillor and MP would he then honour the poll result?


Commitment

Posted on 26-09-2014 08:58 | By Raewyn

Cant see Clayton will make it on the Big scene as he has shown he shows no commitment!


Has his MP Salary Started?

Posted on 26-09-2014 19:29 | By carpedeum

If it has..... then his Council salary from now for next six months should fund the by-election- surely thats only fair !!


I would say..........

Posted on 27-09-2014 18:43 | By groutby

That this situation will bring the true intentions of Clayton Mitchell to reality. If indeed he is a genuine person, he will have sworn alliegence to his position as councillor and ALL responsibilities that go with it...if he does not (and I suspect the intention has always been zero), then do NZ First supporters really still want to give their support to someone who is quite happy to "Waka Jump" at any point at anyone's expense apart from his?


Clayton's Poll?

Posted on 30-09-2014 11:59 | By YOGI BEAR

That trend looks to be obvious at around 70% saying that he should pay the bill for the by-election. That means that the Councilor income received in the last year will be refunded by him. It is not going to be a cost effectively as he just giving back what he should not have had in the first lace as it turns out.


The Poll results....

Posted on 04-10-2014 18:08 | By groutby

Are reasonably convincing Clayton, are you going to emerge and do the right thing..or, exactly what we are expecting...just want to know if you are genuine and likely to do the "right thing" by those who voted for NZ First...or not..any chance of an answer?..I bet not.


Greasy Poll?

Posted on 07-10-2014 22:27 | By Plonker

Clayton will be way to busy clinging on to the chiefs petty coat. If he lets go then he will be left at the station! We do want to make sure gets on the train, goes yonder to Wellington and stays there right?


pay up mate

Posted on 07-10-2014 22:28 | By Plonker

or like NZTA shall we just send the bill for you to pay?


Oh yeah

Posted on 08-10-2014 09:08 | By YOGI BEAR

The poll is now 72% that Clayton pays the bills. The silly notion of working both as Councilor and MP happened as the public decided. The consequence of the latest poll is like "DITTO" come on Clayton, front up and bail out the hard hit ratepayers.


Why delay?

Posted on 21-10-2014 07:42 | By Murray.Guy

Jono Naylor, former Mayor of Palmerston North resigned as Mayor on the 6th October, having secured a National Party List MP seat in Parliament. Nominations for his replacement begin in November with a by-election in February.


Is Mr Guy peeved?

Posted on 22-10-2014 11:14 | By Councillorwatch

Must have been disappointing not to have got the NZ First nomination. But life moves on. Looking forward to Clayton doing the right thing and paying for the byelection??? Hope I don't have to wait too long.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.