Party vote politicking

With Election Day four days away political candidates are wrangling over the party vote, with Act Tauranga candidate Stuart Pedersen offering advice on National's campaign.

Stuart says the orange banners appearing across National billboards, stating people's party vote is crucial, does not give any advice on how to use their party vote effectively.


Stuart Pedersen at yesterday's public meeting held by Act leader Jamie Whyte.

He says a party vote for Act is more potent than a party vote for National, and will secure more right-wing MPs in Parliament.

'It takes about a third fewer votes to elect another Act MP than another National MP.

'So the same number of party votes will elect more right of centre MPs if given to Act. This little known detail of the very complicated method for allocating seats in parliament is designed to favour small parties.”

Stuart says it's the same reason John Key is asking Epsom voters to elect Act's David Seymour.

'They want another strong voice in Parliament besides their own, to counter the opposition from the left.”

Stuart says National voters should split their vote.

'Voters should ask themselves whether they would prefer more Aaron ‘Do you know who I am?' Gilmore types, or high calibre thinkers like Dr Jamie Whyte [Act's party leader].”

If Tauranga voters tick Simon Bridges for their candidate vote, and party vote Act, they are choosing a better group of MPs to make up the coalition, says Stuart.

National voters who want a continuation of a Key-led government need to understand they can be more certain of that result with a party vote for Act, he says.

But Tauranga MP Simon Bridges strongly disagrees.

'Any vote for a minor party – whether it's Act, the Conservative Party, or NZ First – risks political turmoil.

'It's only a strong party vote for National that will keep New Zealand moving in the right direction.”

You may also like....

6 comments

A sign of the times

Posted on 16-09-2014 13:30 | By How about this view!

Effectively all of the major political groups are saying, Do what you like with your electorate vote, we only need the party vote. Once a valued citizen, now just a tick on a piece of paper and that is all we are when it comes to making and changing laws as well. Our input into democracy comes down to a single tick once every three years.


That's not what you told me, Simon

Posted on 16-09-2014 15:31 | By Stuart Pedersen

In an aside at a recent Rotary meeting, Simon had a friendly word and told me that National are hoping for a strong showing by ACT this time, for the reason I gave in the story. Of course he can't say that publicly...


Can't agree

Posted on 16-09-2014 17:18 | By Someone

Simon's quite good at not being honest in public, but then Act and National are also quite good at not agreeing on the same story too - need to get together over a cuppa?


What

Posted on 16-09-2014 19:23 | By Capt_Kaveman

Garbage ACT are a waste of space and Nats well just look what we have and do you like it?


Now, Now Kaveman

Posted on 16-09-2014 23:51 | By How about this view!

Please be careful, your heroic red cape may get caught and fall around your ankles as you bump around looking for your white stick and fall over the dog.


Will ACT finally stick to their principles

Posted on 17-09-2014 13:30 | By The Tomahawk Kid

Do not be mislead by the poor choices of leader the ACT party have had in the past - It looks like they have finally found a man who understands the importance of party principles and willing to stick to them (as opposed to the poison Mr Banks who wouldnt know a party principle if it punched him on the nose). Jamie Whyte is certainly worth watching. If ACT FINALLY stick to their principles it will make them the ONLY party to do so, and therefore worth voting for (but only if you agree with their philosophy). Not sure about Mr Pederson though. Im a bit wary of him.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.