National announces tax cuts

Tax cuts will begin taking effect from 2017 under a re-elected National Government, Finance Minister Bill English has announced today.

In releasing details of the party's fiscal plan this afternoon, Bill says reductions to income taxes will begin from April 1, 2017, by which time government would have $1.5 billion spare cash each year to pay for the cuts.

As set out in the Budget, a National-led Government will restrict average budget allowances for discretionary new spending and revenue measures to $1.5 billion a year over the next three years, he says.

Within this allowance National will:

  • Allow around $1 billion a year for new spending, including between $600 million and $700 million a year more for health and education. This total new spending is consistent with the level of new spending in our last two Budgets and it's well below the $2 billion to $3 billion spending increases under the last Labour government, which had little to show for them.
  • Reserve the remaining $500 million per Budget for modest tax reductions and further debt repayment, as economic and fiscal conditions permit. This portion of the allowance will be moved between Budgets and accumulated as necessary.Therefore, by the third year there will be around $1.5 billion available for tax cuts and debt repayment.

National's fiscal priorities for the next three years will be to return to surplus in 2014, reduce net government debt to 20 per cent of GDP by 2020, further reduce ACC levies in households and businesses, and reduce income taxes.

Bill says any tax reductions will be modest, given the fiscal headroom available, and they will focus on low and middle income earners.

'We will consider the details of a possible tax package closer to the time.

'As the Prime Minister and I have said, we won't be setting out a specific tax package before this election.”

What do you think? Would a promise of tax cuts make you vote National?

You may also like....

19 comments

Answer to the question above...

Posted on 08-09-2014 17:24 | By penguin

DEFINITELY NOT.


Tax Cuts

Posted on 08-09-2014 17:36 | By dstewart

If there is spare money to come why will it not go into health, education or child protection. Get your priorities right, John


Well

Posted on 08-09-2014 17:52 | By How about this view!

We have had the chewing-gum tax cut that never was, So what will this one see the forgotten people getting? All the major battles have been over the unemployed (or Unemployable) or there has been copious amounts of mudslinging about (as Cullen called them) "The rich P***ks". But those that just get on with living, paying their bills on time, paying their union fees and raising responsible children are the forgotten genesis of the Labour party (Ignored by Labour in favour of "Child Poverty"?). When do they count?


More borrowing for tax cuts

Posted on 08-09-2014 21:34 | By Peter Dey

John Key has still not paid for the last lot of tax cuts. He has borrowed over $50 billion. The only way he will give tax cuts is to keep borrowing.


for some

Posted on 08-09-2014 21:37 | By usandthem

just like their last tax cuts when the wealthy got huge tax cuts while the average worker got stuff all.


Be rational please......

Posted on 08-09-2014 23:39 | By groutby

Comments are flowing freely as they should be, but do remember a couple of important things, we will NOT get tax cuts if things do not go to the well organised plan after the next two weeks and the surplus is not achieved as hoped, and, John key has already made it quite clear that such cuts will ONLY be given for low/middle income earners, the definition of such however is not stated at present.Personally I would prefer to see any surplus used for the betterment of our country, and I believe stable government will undoubtedly achieve this.


Peter

Posted on 09-09-2014 07:28 | By YOGI BEAR

So does that mean that there should not be tax cuts, and of course Labour's plans are even more unaffordable?


Given Up on Good Ideas

Posted on 09-09-2014 07:35 | By Disappointed

It is quite simply an absurdity that TeamKey can propose tax cuts for 2017 whilst they continue to borrow $75 million a week every week just to pay the bills (and fund the last round of tax cuts!). Little wonder that after 6 years and an additional $60 billion in national debt the National Party has given up on the slogan "Building a brighter future".


Insulting my intelligence

Posted on 09-09-2014 08:10 | By kopchai

HaHa, Tax cuts in 3years? No details and maybe! Does Key and English think the voters are stupid? Be like me making a statement "that in 3 years I may lose weight"...no details on how much, if any. Please don't insult me. Give facts not ifs and buts.


A Clayton's election bribe

Posted on 09-09-2014 08:39 | By Jack Attack

.......in the meantime (like for the next 3 years) we will hike up GST again, increase petrol taxes and cut back on Gold Card 'perks' so that without realising it Kiwis will pre pay their own 2017 tax cuts. Wake up NZers. This is the biggest election lolly ever. A sugar coated hollow vote catcher.


fair?

Posted on 09-09-2014 11:16 | By Captain Sensible

Labour claim that everyone should "pay their fair share" ie people who work hard to subsidise those that don't. But then is it fair that those hard workers, when they lose their job are not entitled to any welfare because they own a rental? What is fair about never getting access to the taxes that have been taken? About 18% of the workers pay about 80% of the taxes...that's not fair either.


To Peter Dey ...

Posted on 09-09-2014 11:27 | By chancer

Could the borrowed $50M have something to do with continuing to 'prop up' our welfare system through the GFC ?? Think about it ...


Jack Attack

Posted on 09-09-2014 12:36 | By How about this view!

Does Government fund the gold card "PERKS"? I thought that all of the free local transport costs were met by the local ratepayers. I could be very wrong, but I understood that ratepayers fund the regional council, who in turn manage and fund the local bus services? I have not reached handout age yet and am working vigorously to avoid dependence on any government, so I am unaware of any benefits the "goldcard" offers that are not either privately or ratepayer funded. Can someone please enlighten me to just what Winston first has got government to fund for his supporters. Genuine request NOT politically motivated.


My apologies

Posted on 09-09-2014 13:07 | By How about this view!

The Bus fares are funded by taxes through the Ministry of social development.


Tax cuts

Posted on 09-09-2014 14:43 | By dstewart

And as far as "Balancing the Books" That is all smoke and mirrors. You cannot balance the books with so much already borrowed and the amount increasing daily while National does everything to hold on to power at all costs!


Borrow & Hope?????

Posted on 09-09-2014 17:19 | By Jack Attack

The Key govt is sounding more & more like the Muldoom era and 'at the end of the day' that means the promised SURPLUS will not become a reality just like the so called 2017 tax cuts. A blatant election bribe if ever there was one. Their fiscal management is in tatters.


Unaffordable & Irresponsible

Posted on 10-09-2014 13:04 | By Otumoetai

National haven't even run a budget surplus yet, not one! Labour in contrast ran surpluses for 9 out of 9 years. Looks like only Labour can be trusted to balance the government books and pay down debt.


Otumoetai....Have you been sleeping?...

Posted on 10-09-2014 20:36 | By groutby

And missed the the world recession?...yes we borrowed, yes we need to pay it back, and the good news is if given the opportunity it will be paid back and into surplus...if you really believe that a Labour led Government would have seen things differently and not also borrowed (or MUCH worse still for the economy, actually PRINTED money!) ...than I am sad for you, the positive reality is definately not Red...or Green... or Black..or ...indeed a composition of misguided radicals currently on offer.....


dairy prices are tumbling,

Posted on 07-10-2014 23:10 | By GregAKL

And with Europe ramping up to full production of 1980 proportions, theres going to be mountains again. Bet prices wont drop at the supermarket. NZ consumers subsidize the export market, and it costs us more when the economy if doing better, its just not for the NZ consumer. Meanwhile, the Reserve Bank keeps interest rates high, more profit for Aussie banks, which costs us more to live and inflation goes up. Why havnt they dropped ACC levies, like theyve been told to. Lets hope Key gets his knighthood this new years and retires when he cant sign the TPPA.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.