Dog attack decision stuns father

The father of a five-year-old boy left with permanent facial injuries from a dog attack last year is still coming to grips with charges against the dog's owner being dismissed.

In Tauranga District Court on Tuesday, Anthony Hedgeman and Tara Julian successfully defended the charge of owning a dog that attacked a person causing serious injury at a judge alone trial.

Charlie, now five-years-old, and his older sister and mother, Miranda Devereaux, were visiting Anthony Hedgeman and Tara Julian's Baycroft Avenue home on July 12, when he was attacked by the couple's bull mastiff dog.

The then four-year-old approached the dog in the backyard of the property while it was chewing on a bone.

The pre-schooler suffered facial injuries and was rushed to Tauranga Hospital before being flown to Waikato Hospital for specialist care.

The attack was reported to Tauranga City Council on July 13 when the dog was promptly impounded and has since been put down.

In court yesterday the pair defended the charge on the basis they had taken all reasonable steps to prevent the risk of an attack.

Judge Thomas Ingram dismissed the charges saying there is no evidence Hedgeman and Julian had failed to protect their visitors from an attack.

Charlie's father, Henry Pokai, says he is still recovering from the initial shock of hearing the dismissal.

'We are still pretty gobsmacked. I just don't know how it ever got to that point, neither does the council [Tauranga City Council],” says Henry.

'To me this ruling is turning back the clock on dog control or dog management ten years. In the day when we are all meant to be safety conscious and OSH is on to everybody do this and do this; here comes a judge that goes throws it out of court because he felt there was a responsible adult.”

He says the decision makes Tauranga City Council's animal team's job seem 'fruitless” if such incidents are swept aside without any prosecution.

Eight months on from the attack and Charlie is receiving ongoing treatment for the facial injuries, needing scar treatment in Hamilton every couple of months and facial massages four times.

'He's got a happy spirit and is sort of weary of dogs, both him and his sister. We have got our own little dog [a poodle] that we love dearly but it's the bigger dogs and the dogs that are roaming free that scare them,” says Henry.

Tauranga City Council animal services team leader Brent Lincoln says council is not discounting lodging an appeal against the decision, but admits this is not any time soon.

'It is one area that we need to explore to get the clarification on what the judge has said so we are quite a way off that,” says Brent.

During the trial council had both a number of witnesses – including Miranda – and a dog expert that were not called upon by Judge Ingram to give evidence.

You may also like....

7 comments

Listen up Bridges

Posted on 05-03-2014 13:30 | By maildrop

Either the Judge got it wrong or he got it right and the law needs amending. Too many dog attacks are happening, particularly to young kids. It's disgraceful and people must be held to account for the actions of unrestrained dangerous animals.


Jimbo

Posted on 05-03-2014 13:49 | By JIMBO

Double standards here. The dog should have been put down.


OMG!!

Posted on 05-03-2014 14:37 | By RichieR

the dog has been euthanised and im sure the owners are also still upset about that and the fact of what their pet did to the little boy. I'm sorry but i think the judge made a very sane and justified decision in this. What do these parents want, the dog owners blood as well. It was not deliberate it was an accident and why weren't the parents actually watching their own child.


Education

Posted on 05-03-2014 15:11 | By The Sage

I have sympathy for anyone attacked by a dog. It is, however, the responsibilty of parents to educate their children how to behave with children.In this instance, it sounds like the child came between the dog and its food, which is a non no as most dog owners well know. If the children in these attacks were educated and supervised properly most of these attacks would not have occurred.


children and Dogs

Posted on 05-03-2014 15:26 | By Tyraone

I do wish owners of dogs and parents/caregivers of children get it into their heads especially with strange dogs etc. Keep the child away from the dog and the dog away from the child. Regretfully to much of this is going on with the stupididty of some parents/caregivers attitude with strange dogs and children. How does one know that the child victim did not do something hurtful to the dog and the dog who cannot speak for himself or herself tried to tell the child to keep away and when the child persisted that was the dog's only means of defence sad I know but again I plead please keep your dog/s under control and that goes for children as well!!! I know what I am talking about as I own dogs of my own wheich are always under strict control.


Be Careful

Posted on 05-03-2014 16:01 | By Blessed

I dont agree with the Judge, How ever i do think both sides need to take Equal responsibility, Parents need ALWAYS to be wary of Dogs (of ANY size)and Animal owners need to remember,Good animals can do nasty things, a foxy CAN do serious damage to a child too,Medical expenses should at least be considered as compensation. People you need to wake up, Owners need to stop being so Casual about their animals, Watch unfamiliar people around your Pets


BennyBenson

Posted on 09-03-2014 23:30 | By BennyBenson

Jimbo, read the article "the dog was put down". Not sure though what could be achieved by the owners being jailed etc, doesn't seem like they intentionally harboured a vicious dog. I personally would never leave my child outside with my own or anyone elses dog unattended least of all eating a bone!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.