Saturday, May 25, 2013
SunLive - The Bay's news first
Home >> Local News >> Local News

Maori housing report rejected

Follow Us on Facebook   Follow on Twitter
Email A Friend   Printer Friendly Page

The productivity commission’s been told to rethink its attitudes to Maori housing in a hard hitting report into housing needs in the Bay of Plenty.

A lack of in depth analysis, and a failure to address noted shortcomings in the Housing Corporations Kainga Whenua programme are two items listed in submissions to the commission by the Western BOP Maori Housing Forum.


The Forum is a collective of 66 Maori land trusts in the Western Bay of Plenty sub region addressing the issues of housing a Maori population expected to triple by 2051.

Maori land trusts in the region want to open up 21,000ha of Maori owned land to house their people, but are facing attitudinal and institutional barriers.

The commission states housing on Maori land is “valued more for keeping whanau connected to land, tradition, tupuna, and their whanaunga, than as a financial investment. It is “about building communities, rather than building houses.”
The Maori Housing forum’s submission says providing adequate shelter, and basic housing affordability are the two main issues for Maori.

“It may seem trite to say that housing is a basic human need but it is important to remind ourselves of that reality,” states the forum.

“We have current examples of Kuia, Kaumatua and whanau with young children living in caravans and portacoms, overcrowded and unsuitable living situations.

“In these situations the priority for them is not reconnection with the land but provision of adequate housing. Housing is valued by Maori for its purpose as housing.”

The other major hurdle for Maori house builders is financial. Banks won’t lend money using communally owned Maori land as security.

The productivity commission identified this as a major barrier, and confirmed the Kainga Whenua project launched in 2009 has failed with only one loan being granted.

The Maori population for Tauranga is expected to grow by 24 per cent, and the Western Bay of Plenty 14 per cent by 2021.

The forum reports house prices in the sub regions are increasing, while Maori household incomes are decreasing with the general housing market remaining unaffordable for Maori. A total 81 per cent of new homes are being built above the median house price of $340,000, while at the same time more than half of Maori households in Tauranga Moana have a yearly income of less than $50,00 - 32 per cent of Maori households have a yearly income of less than $30,000.

A house valued at $350,000 requires mortgage repayments of more than $600 per week. The average Maori household income is less than $40,000 per year, or $769 gross per week and declining.

Victoria Kingi, director of Papakainga Solutions Ltd says in the WBOP 10 per cent of the housing market comprises one or two bedroom homes, while half of the households in the sub region comprise one or two people, creating a shortage of suitable housing for elderly.

Victoria says Maori whose current accommodation options include living with extended family in often overcrowded or inappropriate conditions, or living in caravans. Developing Maori land for housing, in spite of its own subset of difficulties is the only realistic option for affordable housing that Maori have.

The Maori Housing Forum has been working since 2009 at developing Maori land for housing by engaging in the district plan reviews of both Tauranga City and Western BOP District councils to secure better provisions to develop Maori rural land for housing.

The forum is also carrying out research among its members and is working collaboratively with local councils, the Maori land court and other government agencies to develop joint agency responses and strategies. 

This month sees the formal opening of the Mangatawa Papamoa Blocks Papakainga, a housing project of 10 new homes for Kaumatua, being stage one of a thirty house project.  The Tauwhao Te Ngare Trust will soon implement their Papakainga housing project to build
five homes on Rangiwaea Island.

“The reality is that a lot of housing on Maori land is actually ad hoc, unplanned, and based on a first up best dressed approach. This is especially so where the land has no land trust in place or the trust is not functioning or lacks capability,” says the forum.

“This is further affected by Local Council planning rules limiting the number of houses to two houses per rural title despite the size of the land and its capacity to sustain more housing akin to a community. The task of planning for and delivering papakainga housing on Maori land is herculean and requires capability and commitment of not only land trusts but also other agencies in a collaborative approach to deliver this.

“In turn this requires Government resourcing to provide for Project Drivers or Managers - a range of expertise usually associated with building developments; financial and structuring advice; constant stakeholder management; constant engagement with and assistance to potential home owners or tenants to get them to the level of necessary readiness to qualify for lending. It is no easy task to build a community and requires a new way of operating, a joint agency approach working with Maori.”


 

Comments

One Sided Again

Posted on 20-04-2012 08:33 | By Jitter

According to the Maori party "we are one nation, one people" a statement they have repeated many times. Therefore why should iwi members share of rates and taxes be paid over to iwi to manage for the betterment of their people, as has been suggested by a previous contributor ? My understanding is that there are no rates payable on what is strictly designated as iwi owned land anyway. If the rates and taxes paid by iwi were returned back to them for their own use they would then have no right to use the NZ public health or state education system or any other taxpayer or ratepayer funded systems. I believe it is the right of every taxpayer of NZ to comment on and suggest what the Watangi settlement money is used for when it is their taxes being paid over.

really

Posted on 19-04-2012 14:55 | By traceybjammet

there was no compensation in maori tribal laws years ago, war or looking after ones own whanau were the honorable way not this other carry on and blaming others attitude which one would tend tend to think leans towards whiney english ways from long ago. Its not a matter of "telling" people how to spend tax-payers moneys its just making sure the right people get the benefits and help they need

Comments to date

Posted on 19-04-2012 09:51 | By marama

Ref: people telling Iwi how to use their Waitangi settlements. Really its none of their business. Do we (tangata whenua)tell other groups how they should spend their money? Same situation. These funds represent about 2% of the value of the lands taken illegally from tangata whenua. It’s a form of compensation - how they use it is their business. But let me just add the 2% compensation will never be enough to attend to all the injustices, including social impacts, arising from the land confiscations. Hence Iwi having to grow their asset bases to enable compensation to go further. I accept that we should settlements to help our people, as long as that part of our taxes and rates are also turned over to us to manage for that purpose.


Posted on 18-04-2012 19:04 | By traceybjammet

didnt BOP iwi just get millions of dollars?? couldnt this go towards helping and building suitable and affordable housing that local Maori could buy and then own their own houses in a community that encorages traditional maori values and traditions?? why are they still relying on a pakeha government to provide soloutions??

Use Waitangi Settlement Funds

Posted on 18-04-2012 15:16 | By Jitter

I guess the same situation as outlined above is valid all around the country. Since 1994 however $1,220,307,507 has been paid over by successive governments in 46 Waitangi Claim settlements. Where does this money go ? Should not providing suitable housing be one of the main uses of this money instead of continually asking government and local bodies for additional financial assistance ? I see in the above report kaumatua are to be first in line for suitable housing. Why ? Shouldn’t they as leaders be looking after their people who are most in need especially the elderly first. I can fully understand why banks are reluctant to lend on communally owned land. If the mortgage instalments cannot be paid who do the banks go to ? They will not lend on any communally owned property whether it is Maori or Pakeha owned.I feel very sorry for these people and can see that the Housing Forum has a very hard road ahead. However they may have to in some way get agreement and ensure that title for communally owned land is in the name of one person or association to overcome the major problem of obtaining finance.


Posted on 18-04-2012 13:29 | By mel27

Can they not get money from the billions already given to Maori tribes? I agree the Maori should not be struggling this way but why is all the tribal settlement money going off shore, invested in overseas companies and not being used to help their own whanau? There are some very wealthy Maori and their money is not trickling down to those in need. If the banks won’t help them shouldn’t the money come from tribal payouts? I also wish I could build another home on my semi rural property for my aging parents but council won’t allow me to. I am glad I have a caravan 4 extended family as required.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to make a comment.
Most Viewed This Week
Months Most Comments
©2013 Sun Media Ltd - All Rights Reserved
Sun Media