Interesting to note yet another letter of misinformation from Peter Otway relating to the myth of global warming (Letters, 17 Feb).
As Peter said in his presentation last year, he is not a scientist, he is simply reporting what scientists say. As a non-scientist, I suppose he can be excused for failing to realise that science is not dependent on consensus. If it were we would still believe that theearth was the centre of the universe and was also flat. These were consensus beliefs until a few hundred years ago, when a very small number of scientists disproved them despite huge opposition from the establishment. Little, if anything, has changed.
The science behind the global warming myth is based on the frequently incorrect analysis of non-representative data combined with the fraudulent production of the infamous ’hockey stick’ graph, a scientific fraud exceeding that of the Piltdown Man early last century. Based on this ’evidence’, the preposterously arrogant myth has been proposed that we are causing global warming by releasing carbon dioxide, a highly undesirable ’greenhouse’ gas which must be kept at low levels or the earth will overheat (even though water vapour is a far more effective greeenhouse gas than carbon dioxide). In fact the 375ppm concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide is one of the lowest there has ever been - it has been at least 25 times as high in the past without significant temperature change. If it goes much lower plant growth will cease, then we will have problems. The 10,000 active volcanoes worldwide, most of them submarine, put out far more carbon dioxide per week than humans have ever produced. And global temperatures have no relationship to carbon dioxide concentrations anyway; they correlate well with solar heat output and solar flares, over which we have absolutely no control.
We are currently at the end of an interglacial period that has lasted for 15,000 years, approximately 50% longer than previous average interglacials. At this point in the past four interglacials (and probably for the other >20 that have occurred in the past few million years) the temperature has dropped rapidly - over years or decades, not centuries - sending the earth into a glacial period lasting about 80,000 years. During the last glacial period, with an average temperature drop of around 5 deg C, the sea level dropped 100m or more due to the accumulation of glacial ice on land.
This will be the first glacial that so-called civilised humans have experienced - it should be interesting (from scientiific and sociological viewpoints) to see how we cope.
Alan Willoughby
MSc Earth Science
Welcome Bay



Follow on Twitter
Email A Friend




Posted on 26-02-2012 14:18 | By awilloughby
I totally agree with both the above comments. We live in the real world, not a lab, and we cannot continue to pollute the air, water (both fresh and ocean) and the land with our toxic rubbish. It is for these reasons, and not for the reason that the earth will heat up, that we need to seriously curb our current energy use and waste making processes. Earth will survive quite happily no matter what we do - the big question is will we continue to survive? Most current practices appear to revolve around money - what will it take before people realise that we cannot eat, breathe or drink money? Alan