Rena: iwi place ban on fishing

Tauranga iwi, through the Tauranga Moana Iwi Customary Fisheries Trust, in conjunction with tangata whenua of Motiti Island have placed a rahui or ban around the area surrounding the Astrolabe Reef and the oil slick from the stricken ship Rena.

This prohibits the collecting of kaimoana for consumption from the contaminated area.


As well as the oil contamination of the water near the Rena shipwreck, the emergency responders' use of Corexit 9500 as a dispersant has create a health hazard.

The rahui will encompass all the area of contamination which will change as the oil spreads, however, caution is urged throughout Tauranga Moana for the duration of this crisis.

The 47,230 tonne Liberian-flagged container ship Rena ran aground about 12 nautical miles from Tauranga. It has 2000 containers onboard and is holed in several places.

Tauranga Moana Iwi Customary Fisheries Trust Chairman and Ngai Te Rangi Iwi chief executive, Brian Dickson, says the rahui is a practical and cultural response to the growing problem.

He says the rahui is to assist with preventing the oil reaching other parts of the marine and coastal ecosystem by alleviating the need for boats to enter the area of operations around the Rena and the oil slick. It is also to protect the health and safety of people working in the proximity.

'We understand people may want to see for themselves what is going on, but rubbernecking is not helpful at the moment.

'Boats will collect oil as they move through the slick and then transfer that oil back to the harbour when they return potentially spreading the problem through secondary contamination.

'Shellfish are particularly sensitive to hydrocarbons and other pollutants so anything that can be done to restrict the movement of oil should be done.

'Boats returning to moorings, marinas and ramps are could bring contaminates to shellfish beds in the harbour.”

He says the rahui is being put in place to assist with restoration of the mauri of the ocean, which could be seen as the life force of the ocean and the integrity of the marine ecosystem.

Brian says there are a lot of practical considerations such as keeping the seaways open so salvage vessels, oil skimmers and shore barges can get on with their job unhindered by marine traffic. The aim is to minimise danger.

'Most importantly we want people's health protected so they aren't eating shellfish or pelagic or demersal fish from around the area until everyone is certain they are safe at which time the rahui will be lifted.”

He says a rahui is not enforceable by authorities however in his experience both Maori and non-Maori tend to respect a rahui.

'The rahui has been applied in terms of our tikanga to minimise the adverse effects of this type of disaster.”

Brian says local iwi have a duty of care or kaitiakitanga over the marine environment and so it has been disappointing the Response Leadership Team has not included iwi as part of their group.

'We have asked to be at the decision-making table and been told no, which we don't think is wise, however, we trust that situation will change in the near future and they will see the value in including matauranga Maori.”

He said iwi have been able to point out to those running operations which areas are particularly of interest by iwi to have protected.

'Those areas will be similar to the wider community; all offshore islands, particularly Tuhua/Mayor Island and Motiti Island and the Mauao Maitaitai Reserve; the harbour entrances and entrances to river and stream systems, and other shallow reefs such as Okaparu which is near the Astrolabe reef. We also have concerns about beaches and the harbour that are exposed.

'We have been fortunate with the wind direction so far, however, the forecast is for the wind to change to be coming from the north east which would drive the slick toward the beaches.”

Brian says it is important to keep iwi informed and to ensure those with kaitaiakitanga responsibilities are actually involved at the time when most needed.

'Otherwise all the assurances of integration of cultural requirements is shown to be a thin veneer rather than an actuality.”

He says now all effort must be focused on solving the immediate danger. After that, the assessments of the response will be done.

You may also like....

2 comments

Exclusion zone

Posted on 08-10-2011 15:26 | By justice

Quote "BOP regional harbourmaster Carl Magozinovic has declared a 1km exclusion zone around the ship" un quote. Apart from the air space exclusion zone as well can someone tell me wether or not these are the only LEGAL exclusions?


Toxic Corexit sprayed on oil !

Posted on 09-10-2011 20:39 | By NgaiTeR1

This Corexit in NZ on the oilslick from the ship aground out from Tauranga is the same as the one used on BP's big spill in Gulf of Mexico (USA) Can you believe it?! Corexit 9500 is a solvent originally developed by Exxon and now manufactured by the Nalco of Naperville, Illinois. Corexit is is four times more toxic than oil (oil is toxic at 11 ppm (parts per million), Corexit 9500 at only 2.61ppm). The UK's Marine Management Organization has banned Corexit so if there was a spill in the UK's North Sea, BP is banned from using Corexit.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.