Driveway blocked by development

Sheila Tippett and her neighbours.

Threats of trespass and police intervention has forced a Welcome Bay woman to back down on her protest against developers who have been blocking her driveway in Welcome Bay.

Sheila Tippet was threatened when she returned the favour on Monday and parked across her right of way, blocking access to contractors' vehicles which have been blocking her Osprey Drive right of way for the last two weeks.

In spite of repeated letters to Tauranga City Council there has been no reply.

Sheila says she only found out about the scale of the development along her shared right of way when she found a copy of the service plans in her flowerbed.

They knew owner/developer Hans Pieter Myer wanted to build on the sections, says Sheila.

'We told him we had real concerns about that but we didn't think any more of it, because when we went to seek permission to turn a shed into an independent dwelling, the council said ‘no' because it was served by an undersized right of way,” says Sheila.

They didn't think the developer had permission to build until the plans blew over the retaining wall.

Meanwhile, Sheila and her neighbours have over the last two weeks been blocked in and blocked out by contractors and council vehicles parking in the drive, or digging up the drive, and doing it without notice or informing the Tippetts or the neighbours.

'Everyone says ‘It's not my problem, Oh I am just doing ‘X'.

'Whoever's problem it is need to look on the section that is being developed and as a matter of urgency instead of digging up the right of way for pipes - the first thing they should be doing in my opinion - they need to create a place these construction vehicles can pull off the right of way.

'I understand they have to bring materials in, I'm not stupid. But I also understand if they had made a better effort they could have pulled their vehicles off the right of way - so they could be building and we could still be using it.

'We bought this house at a mortgagee auction because someone went bankrupt trying to do a property development on land served by an undersized right of way. So we just didn't expect to see major development of the land.

'The council already said ‘no' to two or three people already, why would they have a change of heart?"

Sheila's right of way on Saturday morning.

The right of way cannot be widened, says Sheila. On one side there is a sheer drop and the people on the other side had had at least two people asking them to sell a slice of their section to enable the drive to be widened, and they refused to sell.

The issue is the traffic created by each household. Every household has at least two cars and they right of way is already congested.

'If I am turning into the right of way and someone is coming down the right of way you have to back out into Osprey Drive. There are cars parked on the roadside. There are buses whizzing back and forth. The road is steep.

'We have had people total their cars on this stretch already. People who live on Osprey are very concerned about the speeding. There was a speed hump but they had to take it out because the buses went over it so fast the vibrations were creating damage to houses on either side.”

After Shelia blocked the drive the contractors told her they were trying to do concrete today, and that it would only be a couple of hours.

'I said would you have come and told me if I hadn't blocked the drive,” says Sheila.

'They denied us permission to convert a shed to a cottage because of the right of way, so you can understand why I was worried about the size of the development next door.

'We can't have a cottage but he's allowed two extra houses. He was supposed to have one on each, but got consent for four.

'What is going on here? Why suddenly are we having so many houses off this right of way. If it's a discretionary consent why didn't they discuss it with us? Why have we never been approached by anyone?

'In the planning report it's my favourite bit, it says: ‘It has been determined that there are no persons adversely affected by this activity'.”

Tauranga City Council manager environmental planning Natalie Rutland says that at 101 Osprey Drive there's an existing driveway which serves five properties, the subdivision site and 103 and 107 Osprey Drive.

Council considered the effects of allowing an extra site to use the driveway, and granted the subdivision with conditions. The subdivision of the three properties into four fits with the City Plan's density rules.

'We don't have a record of previous consents being denied for subdivision or extra houses on the same site,” says Natalie. 'There is a previous history of subdivision on the site and on the neighbouring property at 103 Osprey Drive. Subdivision consents at 103 Osprey Drive were approved, but it looks like the applicant did not carry out the proposal and the consents lapsed.”

You may also like....

9 comments

FUNNY THIS

Posted on 12-06-2017 20:14 | By old trucker

TCC DONT have a record of previous consents being DENIED,(FUNNY THAT AH) Council have a ANSWER for everything,just wonder if (developer) ????? has BUDDIES in TCC,and went ahead,is it not right for (TCC) to inform these people about this building going on and that the driveway will be torn up,this story STINKS of CORRUPTION inTCC, allowed 2 but building 4,my gosh,They TCC dont care about you,my thoughts only,No1 is Sunlive,Thankyou, 10-4 out.


Sounds suss

Posted on 12-06-2017 21:29 | By overit

I feel for this lady. Tomorrow I will go up and have a look.


Don't worry, the Council is NOT interested in your

Posted on 12-06-2017 22:57 | By The Caveman

rights, as an existing resident on a limited access ROW. Had the same problem 3 years ago. Council NOT interested until my lawyer rang the Council "building consents mob" and said - see you in court in ONE hour for a FULL injunction - TOTAL stop on the development of 17 sections. OH did that get ACTION !!!


row

Posted on 13-06-2017 09:58 | By dumbkof2

when you purchase a property on a row you have to accept that at some stage there will be development going on. seems to me this person just wants to stop anyone from building there


Blame Council not Developer

Posted on 13-06-2017 12:32 | By dbunk

This is totally the councils fault, the developer was given approval on his proposal and he is proceeding with this, this lady is just bitter and twisted because her proposal was denied.


Just the usual

Posted on 13-06-2017 14:24 | By lpm67

Sorry, this is business as usual for the council. I do seem to remember there's a law somewhere about impeding someones access to their property (except for essential REPAIRS), look into it, if so you can have anyone blocking towed.


ROW Ownership

Posted on 13-06-2017 16:45 | By Mackka

Most Row's are privately owned. That is - each section owns a slice of the ROW. The other ROW owners are correct in assuming that the contractors would leave the ROW free for access at all times unless asked otherwise, to park their cars at the bottom of the ROW for a limited time during the day when access would not be possible for the residents. It is a matter of common sense and common courtesy!


Sad

Posted on 13-06-2017 17:50 | By Kancho

I feel for the residence affected. Seems it started with council non notification and then ongoing serious lack of consultation. I had cause years ago to take the council to task over their deeming a development as non notified as council decided it was not significant even though it affected several properties. Sad to say a waste of time and effort it seems council decides and it's then to late to do anything. The developer is trying to make progress but seems contractors could be a tad more understanding and give more notice. Understandably the residents are upset so would I be, but I fear the council high handedness has struck yet again. Smart growth ..my a** development rides rough shod again caused by the council


Muppets

Posted on 13-06-2017 18:48 | By About that

I feel sorry for this lady. A "right of way" would usually mean, residents have "right of way" and access to their own properties. These contractor muppets should use their heads and conduct work during night hours to reduce the need for the right of way to be used and reduce inconvenience. What if their was a medical emergency and the ambo's couldn't get to the person because dick head blocked their drive. Where i used to live, I towed a neighbours car 2 km away with my work truck and left it there. They didn't block the drive again after that.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.