Trustpower have lost a Supreme Court appeal against the Inland Revenue Department which could see them paying millions of dollars in tax.
The court found in favour of the Inland Revenue Department's appeal on whether Trustpower which spent $17.7 million on resource consent for four projects was tax deductible.
The projects are a hydro scheme at Arnold River on the South Island's west coast, a Southland wind farm, a hydro project on the Wairau River and a wind farm near Dunedin.
In 2011, Trustpower filed court action against Inland Revenue saying the $17.7 million spent on the projects in 2006, 2007 and 2008 were tax deductible. Justice Pamela Andrews found in favour of the company.
However, Inland Revenue appealed the decision last year and it was overturned. It was then taken to the Supreme Court by Trustpower and a decision this morning was found in favour of the Inland Revenue.
In a press summary released this morning, Inland Revenue argued the consents were 'intangible” capital assets and therefore what was spent in applying and getting consent was tax deductible.
Trustpower argued that expenditure in relation to a capital project is on revenue account and therefore deductible up to the point at which the taxpayer commits to completion of the project.
It is understood the decision could cost the electricity company almost $15 million in tax and interest and court costs.
Trading in Trustpower shares were halted this morning until this morning's decision.
11 comments
Who..
Posted on 27-07-2016 13:38 | By Jimmy Ehu
has the "power"?!.
No bonuses
Posted on 27-07-2016 14:17 | By Gigilo
Guess the success fee and managerial bonuses has been wiped. Watch for new accountants and advisers. As for the failure cost that will be on the consumers as we still want to produce heady profits. Might be time to exhume Tesla.
Another
Posted on 27-07-2016 14:55 | By RawPrawn
..reason for a good shake up of the RMA. In the end it's the consumers who'll pay, and for what??!!
and others
Posted on 27-07-2016 16:17 | By dave4u
who have had resource consent tax deductable on their projects etc. Looks like a resouce consent box enquiry is about to happen here. What next do you want IRD tax on my chimney smoke???
returns to the community
Posted on 27-07-2016 16:18 | By chatter
I guess all the TECT cheques are going to be put through the shredder now & the AGM on 28th July is going to be a debate.
Tax dodgers.
Posted on 27-07-2016 17:27 | By dgk
Ha Ha, Truspower got caught trying to dodge paying the right amount of tax.
Simple Simon Solution
Posted on 27-07-2016 21:05 | By kellbell
3 newly elected trustees of Tect may be able to help Trustpower out here after all we have a lawyer an accountant and a polis wife. Don't hold your breath
IRD rules not clear enough
Posted on 28-07-2016 06:26 | By BennyBenson
If it needs 2 court cases to decide what is taxable then IRD taxation rules are NOT clear enough. Should be black & white and no confusion whatsoever.
The end
Posted on 28-07-2016 11:47 | By Kaimai
That will be the end of any new investment whether it be dams or windpower.
Complex situation
Posted on 28-07-2016 11:51 | By Chris
There is no way for this complex issue to be adequately conveyed in a news article - as accountants it takes us years to fully understand the appreciate the capital-revenue distinction and why it's important. Comments like the ones on this article are unhelpful and demonstrate a poor understanding of the issue. We shouldn't condemn Trustpower for "tax dodging" - if anything, as an organisation they just spent a lot of money on legal fees to help the rest of us by developing case law in this murky area. On another note, a lot of people seem to be confusing Trustpower and TECT - these are two different organisations, and this court case has absolutely nothing to do with TECT. $15m is also a drop in the bucket with respect to the dividends TECT can expect to receive next year.
some typically silly comments
Posted on 28-07-2016 21:01 | By BullShtAlert
Some people don't even know the difference between Trustpower and Tect but still shoot their mouths off. I would have thought getting a resource consent was part of the cost of doing business and should be tax deductible. Otherwise there is no incentive to develop anything. As has been pointed out also, Tect is a shareholder in Trustpower and doesn't make decisions on tax matters. Some dummies just don't get it.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.