Bay iwi claims pass reading

Two Bay of Plenty iwi who were "virtually stripped of all their lands, could now start to rebuild culturally, environmentally and economically", says Te Ururoa Flavell.

The Minister of Māori Development's comments come following the second reading of the Ngāti Hineuru Claims Settlement Bill and the first reading of the Ngāi Te Rangi and Ngā Pōtiki Claims Settlement Bill in Parliament today.


Minister of Māori Development Te Ururoa Flavell.

Te Ururoa says in both cases the Crown had committed serious and repeated failures to live up to its Treaty obligations; and Crown initiated conflict had virtually stripped the iwi of their lands, leaving only a tiny remnant of what they once held.

'Any resistance led to huge land confiscations and for Ngāti Hineuru many of those who resisted the Crown's confiscations were banished or summarily executed.

'For Ngāi Te Rangi and Ngā Pōtiki, Crown purchases and the compulsory acquisition of ‘uneconomic' interests, as well as public works takings had inflicted massive harm on the mana, identity, way of life, and economic and social wellbeing of the iwi.”

He says both settlements recognised the mana of the iwi and reaffirmed their rights over their lands.

The redress helped heal the pain of the past by setting the record straight regarding the iwi and their history with the Crown as well as the injustices suffered by their people.

'Through cultural redress the people of both iwi are reconnected with a number of their most culturally significant sites, whilst financial and commercial redress reasserts their role in their region and provides a strong economic base for them to grow.

'Today represents the beginning of a brighter future for Ngāti Hineuru and Ngāi Te Rangi and shaping the world they want their mokopuna to inherit. It is testament to the mana of the iwi in moving beyond grievance and into development and growth.”

Ngāti Hineuru, an iwi of the Te Hāroto region on the Napier to Taupō Road, suffered a loss of land and mana after Crown attacks on the tribe at Ōmarunui and near Pētane in 1866, during which its rangatira Te Rangihīroa was killed.

The historical claims of Ngāi Te Rangi and Ngā Pōtiki primarily relate to the Crown initiated military conflict in Tauranga in 1864 and the ensuing confiscation/raupatu as well as the imposition of the native land laws in Tauranga Moana, Crown purchasing methods in the Tauranga District in the 1880s and 1890s, the compulsory acquisition of land and major public works takings.

You may also like....

5 comments

Settlements are good...but

Posted on 25-05-2016 18:53 | By groutby

Mr Flavell says..."start to rebuild culturally, environmentally and economically"...the intent is clearly not a done deal...again. How do we (who allow these claims) get to know the success of having yet more money "thrown at it"..(for that is what it is)... lower prison and less offending for over represented Maori?...more employment and better education leading to become good citizens paying their "fair share" in the community? Mr Flavell, an answer please...my best guess is I will not receive an answer from him, apart to be called a "racist" or "redneck" by some, and the usual suspects I reckon...


@ groutby

Posted on 26-05-2016 08:03 | By Captain Sensible

I reckon you're right.


stripped the iwi of their lands

Posted on 26-05-2016 08:39 | By Capt_Kaveman

thats the biggest fabrication i keep hearing, they need to move on and get on with it, out of all the pay outs im yet to see where it helps the young


Political archaeology

Posted on 26-05-2016 10:56 | By Towball

Douglas Graham supposedly dealt with and Moari had a dead line which upon to file claims against the Crown, obviously has been and gone yet still these accusations allegations once again are extremely timely with the budget housing current economy and so on. Almost $20 million set aside for Maori Pacifica, in way of apprenticeships support on top of GET REAL !. What next all MIGRANTS entering now will have claims and assistance in future years as if any different would be could be PREDJUSTICE. My family paid taxes in this country long before this claim so I want those back also under the current circumstances were misapproapiated therefore fraud so I have a case also . Redneck.


Talk to the Queen

Posted on 26-05-2016 11:37 | By Gigilo

Worn out rhetoric from those who need to get real and help themselves out of self inflicted cycles.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.