‘One strike’ proposal for state houses

Social housing often hits the news for all the wrong reasons, believes Tauranga Community Housing Trust's Jo Gravit.

Last week New Zealand First social policy spokesperson Darroch Ball's proposed state house tenants who have contaminated properties with methamphetamine should be kicked out for life.


New Zealand First social policy spokesperson Darroch Ball has proposed that any tenant found contaminating state houses with meth should be 'kicked out for life”. Photo: File

Under current housing New Zealand policy, if tenants are found using or manufacturing meth their tenancy will be terminated immediately and they can also face a 12 month suspension from applying for another property.

According to HNZ figures, eight properties in the Bay of Plenty tested positive for meth as of December 2015, while 18 properties tested positive during the 2014/15 financial year.

Darroch says hundreds of state houses around the country are currently sitting empty due to meth contamination which he describes as 'a national disgrace”.

'At present tenants removed from a state house for P contamination can be back in a state house within as little as 12 months. We cannot allow state houses to be used for criminal activities,” he says.

'That behaviour comes at the expense of the taxpayer to the tune of tens of millions of dollars for clean ups and hundreds of honest families on state house waiting lists.”

But TCHT chair Jo Gravit sees meth as a widespread problem throughout the communities that we all need to face.

She says the number of people desperate for accommodation is increasing rapidly due to Tauranga's growing population. Every day the trust and other social services providers face the reality of people with desperate housing needs and the impact of uninhabitable houses just adds to the shortage.

'Our Tauranga community stakeholders, as well as central government are aware of the issues, and the need for a wider range of housing choices.

'But we all need to work together to decide how we can address this shortage in practical terms and how the growing risk of P contamination can best be addressed.

'We need every house possible in the rental pool and a few hundred more as well.”

HNZ chief operating officer Paul Commons says the government agency is increasing its focus on identifying homes where meth has been used or manufactured.

The organisations takes a zero tolerance approach to any illegal activity in its homes and will move swiftly to end a tenancy.

'Housing NZ will not tolerate any use or manufacture in our properties and where we find evidence we will not only end the tenancy, but we'll suspend them from living in one of our properties.

'We will pursue the tenants for costs associated with remediation where a property is contaminated.”

TCHT welcomes HNZ's zero tolerance approach, saying these clear messages are widely supported.

Housing New Zealand owns or manages 67,000 properties across New Zealand, housing around 193,000 people.

You may also like....

7 comments

Great proposal

Posted on 04-04-2016 10:12 | By hapukafin

Darroch this has got to be the best proposal yet,as it has been noted refurbishing P homes is going to be worst than leaky homes and this has to be paid by taxpayers.


Get tough and boot them out

Posted on 04-04-2016 10:17 | By Annalist

Soft words like meth is everyone's problem don't cut the ice with me. Lock up the perps for life and keep these crime families out of state housing. Let them live in tents in the forest. The reason for the increasing manufacture of drugs is that the law is far too soft and we all know that.


very simple

Posted on 04-04-2016 10:27 | By Capt_Kaveman

convicted meth use = instant 10yrs jail, went to an open home the other day to find meth been used in sleepout, sad


So...

Posted on 04-04-2016 12:11 | By penguin

...the meth users get kicked out and handed a $50,000 invoice. And how many of them will be able to cough up that sort of money? So, they will plead hardship and sweet talk their way into paying a paltry amount say, $5 a week? It's a joke. Seize any assets and cut any benefits. Tag them for life through IRD and dock any earnings. Unfortunately, it looks like the tax payers will end up footing the bill somehow.


P homes

Posted on 04-04-2016 18:14 | By peter pan

Surely in this day and age yoou should be able to insert a bug that could warn the athorities that p or any other banned substance was being used or manufactured in the home.Also as has been suggested ban them for life.It would also be a good idea to post their photo`s on all public buildings for all to see.


P in all walks of life.

Posted on 05-04-2016 00:01 | By Blessed

Kick these fools out for life n MAKE the pay thru taxes, control their benefits (completely) & make them do community wrk. What also worrys me is how many professionals out there smoke this crap. Makes me so angry that people completely abuse a service (home) that so many good reliable people are struggling to find, let alone AFFORD!


Untouchable

Posted on 05-04-2016 13:58 | By Towball

Because these people under current law have rights equally hence the twelve month stand down on application which is in reality a good behaviour bond. Infuriates me equally but until their is difinitive acknowledgement and punishment appropriate with the offence this tradional behaviour will continue. Typically a case of not my problem so an interdepartmental shuffle at the TAX PAYERS EXPENSE again. Is not only the tenant but all the other people involved all drawing a wage as well. Cerco get a bonus for their performance tenants are same all part of the same enviroment.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.