Island debacle: ‘Tribal interests'

Matakana Island Panepane Point's (200 hectares) debacle has nothing to do with cultural significance, or grievance claims, merely tribal interests yen to own land! Only on tribal radar in 2012 and was never on Waitangi claim's shopping list.
Presumably, Panepane Point has Local Authority Reserve status that benefits all Kiwis, not just vested tribal interests whose agenda is control of both sides of Tauranga Harbour entrance, which is certainly not in the long term public interest.
Transfer of this land is a farce, and while on the subject, there is no reason to think this strategic land will not be required for Port of Tauranga purposes in the future.
Every Western Bay citizen should be appalled and outraged, and must remain vigilant with a view to opposing these land grabs and always questioning why the public don't get any say from the outset.
The public excluded council meeting on December 17, 2015, was a no-no. Western Bay of Plenty District Council must be held accountable for its actions because not being transparent, accountable or honest about these matters.
Full historical details of the the Panepane Point purchase circa 1923 must be published by council.

R Paterson, Tauranga

You may also like....

6 comments

Transparency

Posted on 05-02-2016 14:32 | By Anbob

is, unfortunately, a thing of the past with Councils. Totally, agree with all points, R Paterson. Land is still being used for the same purpose, so what has changed!!! Think the next Council elections will be interesting!


Jmac

Posted on 06-02-2016 12:58 | By JohnMac

The whole of Matakana Island with the exception of any current freehold title should be Iwi owned. Why not. All the cream of Tauranga has been put into freehold now and I should imagine many Maori would feel somewhat disenfranchised at the current situation. Why do Pakeha get so upset when small areas are handed back to Maori especially when one looks at how well land is managed on Matakana by Maori now. I happen to be third generation British and I support sensible and thought out resolution of the obvious wrongs the first people of NZ have had to endure.


@ JohnMac

Posted on 11-02-2016 09:51 | By Captain Sensible

"handed back" implies they owned it. If they bought it fair & square, then no problem. But if they just claimed it saying they owned it pre 1840, then I have a problem with that. Pre treaty maori did not own anything....they squatted there until a stronger tribe ate them or chased them away.


SINCE WHEN?

Posted on 11-02-2016 21:01 | By crazyhorse

Has our council or any other council been given the mandate to give away land, or, take away the rights of the other 85% of the population, and have you noticed campers, always behind closed doors, in future councilors and especially the mayor should "screened" as to the reasons why they want to be in local Gov't, look what happened in Rotorua, and what about Andrew Judd in New Plymouth, a resounding no to part maori on council and this culturally hypnotised "idiot" wants to go to the UN, local Gov'ts not there for anyone to push their racist barrow, or force their views down everyone else's throat.


Mr Ken Smith

Posted on 21-02-2016 21:36 | By k Smith

Well all those people who are against Maori land claims haven't a clue of human rights no matter what race they are, Maori are the native people of NZ and have rights to claim for the wrongs done to them so get over it, the treaty of waiting document come about because the corrupt british royals couldn't defeat the Maori so they used the treaty as a start to create the massive land grab off the Maori.a document written by the british in mostly in favour of themselves to allow the land grab which occurred during this time so if you think they have no claims why is it this has been through the court process from the commonwealth law and have been awarded compensations for the wrong doings, you are also saying the law is wrong. ARE YOU ALL SMARTER THEN THESE HIGHLY QUALIFIED LAW PEOPLE?


K Smith

Posted on 26-02-2016 13:56 | By Anbob

Chief Justice Pendergrast called the Treaty


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.