Support for smoking ban

Local Government New Zealand is angling for smoking in outdoor areas of bars, cafes and restaurants to be banned – and it's a move supported by the Toi Te Ora Public Health.

According to Medical Officer of Health Dr Phil Shoemack, outdoor dining areas have some of the highest levels of second-hand smoke of all public spaces.


Toi Te Ora Public Health is supporting a move to ban smoking in outdoor areas of cafes, bars and restaurants. Photo: File.

In close proximity, second-hand smoke intake by non-smokers is similar to what was experienced prior to the indoor smoking ban, he says.

'The extension of smokefree spaces to include outdoor dining areas will help achieve the government's goal of a smoke-free Aotearoa by 2025,” says Phil.

'Having the extension of existing smokefree spaces legislation on the national agenda is extremely positive.

'It is a significant step as we look to improve the overall health of our community by achieving the smoke-free 2025 goal.” Phil says it's exciting that this LGNZ remit is supported by several local councils.

'Toi Te Ora encourages all councils to extend their smokefree policies to include outdoor dining areas, regardless of the outcome at the national level,” he adds.

'A smoke-free outdoor dining policy supports health and safety requirements to ensure the provision of safe environments.

'Extending smokefree environments to include outdoor dining areas also helps to further denormalise smoking.

'This means that people of any age will be less likely to start smoking, those who are trying to quit will feel supported in their efforts, and ex-smokers will be less likely to start lighting up again.

'Smoking kills up to half of its users. It's important to remember that smoke-free outdoor policies are designed to provide a pleasant smoke-free environment for everyone.

'Every person should have the right to breathe smoke-free air.”

A recent survey confirmed that nine out of ten of Aucklanders would be more likely, or just as likely, to visit outdoor dining areas if they were smoke-free.

Of particular interest in the same survey was the fact that eight out of ten smokers said they would continue to visit smoke-free dining areas.

Phil says similar legislation introduced in Australia shows that public support for smoke-free dining increases even further after the changes have been introduced, and they often have a positive impact on business profits.

'It's also encouraging that some local restaurants have already made the decision to introduce smoke-free outdoor dining,” he adds.

'Their commitment to providing the best environment for their customers is commended and we encourage others to do the same.”

You may also like....

8 comments

Hooray Hooray

Posted on 30-07-2015 10:21 | By spikeredmires

This is a long overdue. Smokers have all the best seats at an eatery sitting outside admiring the view and us non smokers have to sit inside. I shouldn't have to walk through smoke to have my meal or a drink, and before the smokers start moaning about car fumes and drinking being bad for you, smoking is the highest killer and the most costly to our health service in Cancer treatment, Loss of limbs and so on. Bravo come on council show a lead in this and don't procrastinate.


@spikeredmires....

Posted on 30-07-2015 12:06 | By Jimmy Ehu

absolute rubbish, and I am a non smoker and non drinker, alcohol has by far the biggest health and social cost of any drug!! get your facts correct and include all family breakdown and accident costs as well, I detest the smell of smoke but also will not allow alcohol to be put on a pedestal!!!!


Jimmy ehu

Posted on 30-07-2015 13:48 | By maildrop

Yet another who does not understand the reason for this law. It is not whether smoking is more or less harmful than booze. It is the well proven harmful effects of smoking on those who do not wish to participate, i.e. Second hand smoke. If drinkers wanted to pour drink down my throat against my wishes I think it would be deemed assault. Do you get it yet?


Just the thing i need..

Posted on 30-07-2015 15:51 | By kiwigrunt

I am a smoker and have tried many times to quit, more smoke free this country becomes, the better it will be for me to give this horrible habit up.


@maildrop....

Posted on 30-07-2015 17:05 | By Jimmy Ehu

please do not preach to me what I can or cannot understand, with your reasoning a driver under the influence of alcohol can seriously injure someone who is minding their own, and yet you say second hand smoke is more dangerous, get out of here!!!, it's not the bylaw plans I have an issue with it's the hypocrites that decry smoking yet continue to ignore the harmful affects of alcohol, smoking is not socially acceptable anymore and I agree should be banned, but do not tell me smokers are a bigger cost to our well being than alcohol.


Smokers

Posted on 30-07-2015 17:33 | By peter pan

When all the smokers are banned from meeting in public mabe we should do the same with wine and beer as they are killers also,All they have to do is have a designated smoking area.They smoke outside because thats where we put them.I am not a smoker.


Thats so cool

Posted on 30-07-2015 18:05 | By Dazed and Confused

1 wants to quit , 1 complains smokers are getting something he or she wants and the other 1 wants to yell at us and infer we are stupid. What a tolerant society we live in ... Lite em if yall gotem and just chill out a bit


@jimmyehu

Posted on 07-08-2015 16:29 | By maildrop

You need to read a bit more carefully Jimmy. I didn't say anywhere that smoking is more harmful than drink driving. Difference is, and this is key so take it in, there is already a law against drink driving!! This law is to do with smoking in public places. Stop getting the two things confused.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.