Council gets the big tick

Among the volumes of reports, documents, submissions and statements produced in the recent city council long term plan process, there is one that councillor John Robson keeps.

It's only nine pages, supplementary agenda DC 186, and the relevant paragraphs are on page four.

Staff report says previous councils didn't look after its buildings, or its people.

'Council's proactive approach to city infrastructure asset management can be contrasted, however, with the historical approach to internal Council infrastructure. External community service infrastructure has been prioritised and internal infrastructure has not been maintained adequately.”

That's bureaucratese for this particular city council is doing a better job compared to previous Tauranga city councils, from the employees point of view.

'In particular there has been continued under-investment over a number of years in Information Communications Technology (ICT), the civic campus buildings and professional development of our staff,” the report continues.

This has led to:

• In the ICT area; information risks, not delivering commonly accepted customer service options (such as online transactions) and inefficient work practices (due to lack of effective electronic systems including automated work streams)

• In the Civic Campus Building area; downstream failures, an unhealthy work environment and unforeseen costs.

• Professional development; under investment in our people negatively impacting on both morale and capability. This underinvestment is detailed in DC180, "investment in people and expertise", table 6.

'An objective assessment of our historical approach to investment in ICT, campus building and our human resources would suggest under-investment and a lack of focus on internal sustainability and risk management. This is likely attributable to a mix of resource prioritisation and insufficient understanding of the broader value proposition that these investments represent to the organisation and the city.”

It's the last strategic direction produced by staff as part of the long term plan process, says John.

'I actually carry it with me because I find it fascinating,” says John.

'So what that paper tells me is that I was right. The previous people who have run the city council have failed to look after out buildings, our systems, and our people.

'Now if you have a board running a company that failed to look after your assets, your buildings, systems… So the people of Tauranga did well when they changed the board.”

It was a collective responsibility and individuals can't be blamed, but clearly the previous city councils didn't cover themselves in glory, says John.

'This is not John Robson's view. I wasn't the author of it. We just received it, didn't react to it. But people like me were thinking, maybe we are learning.”


Cr John Robson, find the staff report fascinating

(In October 2013 just days before the local body elections, the previous council approved the confidential payment of $1.34 million to upgrade the city's computers. The information did not become public until it appeared in the following year's accounts in June 2014.

In December the council acknowledged a serious mould issue in the leaky council buildings that has cost about $1m so far and remains unresolved. Most of the council staff are now in rented office space about town. No decision has been made about the future of the buildings, but the option of demolition and rebuilding is being openly talked about.)

The report goes on to say that the evidence from successful organisations across the world is that up-to-date approaches and appropriate investment 'upstream' in a city administration's people, tools, environment and external relationships leads to better 'downstream' decisions and ultimately to more efficient and effective capital investments.

It is clear that the council needs to apply the same renewal investment philosophy to internal infrastructure as it applies to the external community infrastructure.

The strategic framework for growth management, which includes SmartGrowth, the City Plan, the Infrastructure Strategy and associated policies and plans, represents a coherent and transparent framework, developed collaboratively with stakeholders.

The strategic growth framework provides clarity and confidence to investors and the community, says the report. It supports integrated and efficient investment decisions that have allowed Tauranga to begin to take advantage of the economic and social benefits of growth without being overwhelmed by the costs.

Effective growth management is a national as well as a local issue. Auckland land supply constraints, traffic and housing market dynamics appear to be beginning to have a greater influence on the appeal of Tauranga and in turn on local land and property markets. Tauranga's comparative advantage in terms of "years of ready to go land" for housing - currently 12-17 years in Tauranga vs 3 in Auckland - has so far mitigated Tauranga house price inflation. At the same time, availability of competitively priced, zoned commercial land and access to the port has helped.

You may also like....

13 comments

Big tick!!!!

Posted on 27-07-2015 12:57 | By Jimmy Ehu

from who????, and here was I thinking a pat on the back was an Irish pillion passenger.


Gobbledegoop

Posted on 27-07-2015 14:17 | By mouldy

What a lot of rubbish!! - what does it mean in plain english


Does not sound like a big Tick

Posted on 27-07-2015 14:31 | By Watchdog

to me. Building Flat roofed buildings is always going to create a leak somewhere. I bet the one next door had one as well. With bitumen coated coverings that eventually crack and let water in it makes it very hard to repair and the water can travel inside a building and come out in unexpected locations. Sloping roof is best. NO internal guttering. That's another recipe for disaster. Will we ever learn?


Choking!

Posted on 27-07-2015 15:01 | By Mackka

They say to give a 'pat on the back' when something/someone is choking! How very apt in the case of Cr Robson and his merry mob at the council!


A BIG TICK -YEAH RIGHT

Posted on 27-07-2015 15:11 | By CONDOR

I agree what the hell does it all mean in plain English and showing the picture of what looks to be a leaky City Hall does not augur well at all.Yes Elected Members may be an issue but I think the emphasis is on the pointy head bureaucrats and I believe you will find them holed up alive and well flourishing in the system still.Yes Minister as they say.


Accolades

Posted on 27-07-2015 15:17 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

To the spin doctor that wrote this load of tosh. The PR machine is in overdrive at council to prepare us for a huge cost increase.


Jimmy Ehu

Posted on 27-07-2015 17:49 | By YOGI BEAR

Excellent comment there, although I reckon the pillion passenger should be plural, you know about five or six leeches hanging on and sucking the life blood out of the good people.


Go get a job u plonker

Posted on 27-07-2015 18:11 | By stokey

Its a pity these wowsers have nothing better to do - like representing residents who pay their wages and get rid of half the council employed hangers on trying to justify their existence. We need a ratepayer revolution!


More like a ticking off

Posted on 27-07-2015 20:31 | By kellbell

Didn't see too much in that advertorial that would tick the boxes and I suspect all current EMs run the risk of getting the flick in 2016 rather than the tick for efforts to date.No one is safe.


Put down the mirrors

Posted on 28-07-2015 08:39 | By Murray.Guy

Unfortunately an all too typical attempt at self-gratification from an individual that lives in a room of mirrors. Glaringly absent is any reference to the report writer's identity (deliberate) and ANY understanding on the part of Cr. Robson of the role of elected members versus operational staff. It is totally, and not surprisingly, dishonest to imply that operational deficiencies (building maintenance, IT upgrades etc.) are the result of previous governance bodies at Council. In the absence of the report and it's author(s) I can be confident that it is selective and biased, likely an in-house 'sugar water' report. John, you're killing off ratepayers with crippling debt ($300m > $500m) arrogant incompetency, ballooning staff numbers and destroying meaningful democracy. You're spending mega dollars replacing glass on the Admin building yet likely to demolish it - does this capture your logic, expertise and integrity of decision making?


Really?

Posted on 28-07-2015 10:56 | By BullShtAlert

One has to wonder just who was the author of the document praising the current council? From my failing memory various fixes have been applied to the council building by past councils. Were those not applied on the recommendation of council staff??? A lot of the words in this story seem like gobbledygook to me.


Councillor John....

Posted on 28-07-2015 17:13 | By Jimmy Ehu

will there be a provision in any new Council buildings built on the width of the doorways, as with the specifications as they are, no way will you be able to fit your head through them!!!!, then again it may just be easier and cheaper for you not to be re elected.


Cr. Robson demonstrates his loyalty ...

Posted on 28-07-2015 19:41 | By Murray.Guy

Among the volumes of reports, documents, submissions and statements produced in the recent city council long term plan process, there is one that councillor John Robson keeps .... Thank you Cr. Robson for confirming the obvious, that you have little regard for the submissions/opinions/wishes of the community, the ratepayers, choosing above all others a somewhat, at best, suspect opinion piece submitted by staff. It's confirmed, the treasured report DC 186 was orchestrated by staff in an effort, successfully so in Cr. Robson's case, to validate their excessive debt and staff escalations, diverting attention from the reality of gross incompetence as they impose half a $billion in debt on ratepayers and millions on mould!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.