Research centre from Rena fund

A Maketu-based marine research centre is to be established as part of the restoration and mitigation offer from the Rena owners and insurers.

Former Bay of Plenty Regional councillor and Maketu resident Raewyn Bennett says it's a package deal that covers a range of things in return for the coastal Te Arawa hapu withdrawing opposition to the resource consent application to leave the remainder of the Rena wreck on the Astrolabe Reef.

The Rena after striking the Astrolabe Reef on October 5, 2011. Photo: File.

'It's all going to come out with the resource consent process, all the details, says Raewyn.

'But for Te Arawa our first option would have been to get the wreck removed entirely. We know it can't be done without further wrecking the reef.

'And so we have taken this step, we will invest in building a research facility that is actually about the ongoing protection of the moana.”

She says it is the pragmatic approach. The settlement from Dain Shipping and The Swedish Club is not $750,000, and she won't give a figure.

'It's a whole package of things, it's not just cash, it's about resource consent conditions, it's about monitoring the mauri for the next 10 years, a whole lot of other things, - getting rid of rubbish.”

'We got the mauri package included in that.”

'Part of it was undertaking in agreeing to leave the body of the wreck the hard part that can't be removed without wrecking the rock further which was not acceptable to Te Arawa. We are looking at an investment in a matauranga Maori research facility in Maketu.

Former Bay of Plenty Regional councillor and Maketu resident Raewyn Bennett

The 37,000 tonne container ship Rena struck the reef on October 5, 2011. The ship had about 1368 containers and 1700 tonnes of heavy fuel oil on board.

With the bow of the ship stuck fast on the reef, wave action soon broke the ship's back, and spilled oil and cargo into the sea. Storms over the ensuring years resulted in wave action sliding the ship further down the reef, to where the bulk of the remnant now lies in water about 50m deep.

The depth makes further salvage work more difficult, more dangerous and more expensive.

In May 2014 Daina Shipping lodged resource consent applications under the Resource Management Act to leave sections of the wreck and associated debris in place on the reef, and to provide for any future discharges of contaminants that may arise from leaving the wreck in place.

The mitigation and restoration provisions of the resource consent application are part of the public record and have been available on line since May 2014.

'The intent of the Restoration and Mitigation Package is to provide funding for education, research and community projects for the people of Motiti, Te Arawa Iwi (Maketu), Tauranga Moana Iwi and the wider Bay of Plenty community. The funding is apportioned to those community groups and will be managed by the consent holder,” states the application.

The Astrolabe Community Trust is established to implement the funding package. The Trust will subsequently allocate funds to projects in accordance with defined principles or defined projects.

These are environmental, social, cultural and economic projects.

The projects can provide education and training in any of or several, marine and coastal sciences, environmental management, commercial fishing, navigation and seamanship, maritime industries, emergency management, pollution, contamination and related areas.

Also areas of research for the furtherance of knowledge in such matters as the marine and coastal environment, processes, oceanography, commercial and non-commercial fisheries, marine mammals and birds.

The Implementation of projects that provide for the remediation of coastal and marine environments for the benefit of local communities. Assist community groups and affected sector groups involved in surf life-saving, coast care, non-commercial fishing and diving, emergency response and management in the area of benefit.

The Maketu Te Arawa hapu is the first to announce reaching such an agreement. It's not well received.

The Remove the Rena Facebook page says it's very sad that some iwi would put the integrity of the environmental stand taken by other hapu and iwi up for sale in this way.

'Ngai Te Hapu is extremely disappointed that these Te Arawa iwi with coastal interests have chosen to take the money yet also want a say on what happens on Motiti on the taonga reef Otaiti because of their ancestral links. Through this action they spit on their ancestral links.

'It is a most selfish position especially when their small piece of coastline that was affected by the Rena oil spill was cleaned up largely through the voluntary efforts of the wider iwi and community. Did not see any of those iwi out on Motiti helping clean up the mess. Shameful.”

Kaumatua from the other Motiti hapu, Patuwai have in the past expressed sentiments similar to Raewyn Bennett's. They could not be contacted for this article.

Ngai Te hapu spokesman Buddy Mikaere believes Patuwai has turned down the restoration and mitigation offer. He believes Tauranga iwi Ngai Te Rangi iwi, Te Runanga o Ngati Awa and Nga Potiki a Tamapahore have also turned down offers.

You may also like....

11 comments

And tell me Judas ...

Posted on 22-06-2015 16:40 | By Murray.Guy

If, as you desire, the Rena wreck remains off our shores, is it reasonable to assume that you will accept all liability for any future impacts on the environment, marine life and coastline? Once your pieces of silver are gone, who are you going to expect to carry on meeting the costs associated with your Maketu based marine research centre ... let me guess, you'll syphon it off the BOP RC ratepayers!


We stand together.....

Posted on 22-06-2015 16:45 | By yikes61

unless you offer us thirty pieces of silver!


Looking for a double handout

Posted on 22-06-2015 17:21 | By Towball

This another classic example of pay now and pay a lot more to the future generation's. When are the people of NZ going to stop bending over grabbing their ankles and getting screwed. You have to wonder what association these huge salary suckers have with these organizations. A few people {IWI} poised waiting for the next free meal ticket. Grow some balls and make the shipping company pay for the whole clean up , this is why these countries continually do what they do here . Lazy law enforcement in this country and scared of upsetting someone who has no regard for us as a country otherwise we would have made a stand on the international stage when it first happened." IWI" aren't the only ones affected by this what about the rest of us or don't we count ?. BOTTOM FEEDERS !.


Fascinating...

Posted on 23-06-2015 08:37 | By penguin

...how money can transcend moral and cultural values. Well done the groups that are standing fast to their principles. It must be heart-rending to see the other 'bros' throwing away aspects of their culture for the sake of a type of bribery. Of course, the fact that a marine centre will be built with the money will be used to justify acceptance of the 'gift.' Pull the other one Te Arawa!


Marine Centre?

Posted on 23-06-2015 10:54 | By Murray.Guy

Don't we have such a facility at Sulphur Point? After the few pieces of silver have been squandered on a Maketu facility who will pick up the tab for the running costs? Let me guess, the BOPRC have already agreed to be a 'partner'?


@ Towball

Posted on 23-06-2015 11:01 | By Captain Sensible

You are right, as second class non-maori citizens ( also the majority) we do not count. We are second class. In RSA, Mandela fought for equal rights for the majority. Anyone in NZ who does that is branded a 'racist'.


How Dare they!

Posted on 23-06-2015 11:11 | By DAD

Maketu was not even affected as much as other parts of the coast!


rena

Posted on 23-06-2015 11:17 | By dumbkof2

Ok try and remove the wreck and completely destroy the reef then you will all be happy till you find something else to moan about


not towing the line

Posted on 23-06-2015 12:55 | By Edster

@ towball, fact is Iwi are prepared to litigate against leaving the wreck there on principle, the same principle from the outset. Iwi have opposed the plan to gain resource consent to leave it there, and the proposal from the owners is what if we pay those opposed to leave it there as compensation, (no different from any other litigation matter I might add) which appears to be being accepted by those Iwi complainants that have little or no real buy in and are hanging by the shirt tails of those that do. Also have the BOPRC and other Councils accepted compensatory payments levelled at them on account of their opposition? Proof is in the pudding, are they opposed or is Iwi taking the stand from the multinationals?


dumbkof2, the wreck

Posted on 23-06-2015 13:09 | By Murray.Guy

dumbkof2, the wreck removal process CANNOT destroy all the reef as you state as it only impacts on a very small portion of it! Should in the full removal process the reef incur further damage, that it surely preferable to have a natural environment at the end of the day that is healthy and represents no potential further risk, that respects the fact that the Rena does NOT own the reef, it is NOT theirs to dump on, regardless of how much! dumbkof2


rena

Posted on 23-06-2015 19:56 | By dumbkof2

Murry Guy Read the article again. Particulary the first part


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.