Tower gets new lease of life

A new $65,000 tower will keep watch over Mount Maunganui Main Beach next summer after Tauranga City Council agreed to preserve community safety and help replace the current version.

As part of this week's Long Term Plan deliberations, councillors voted 10-1 in favour of granting $200,000 to Mount Maunganui Lifeguard Service - $65,000 for the tower and $135,000 to upgrade its emergency/first aid room in 2016.


Mount Maunganui Lifeguard Service general manager Glenn Bradley inspects the club's tower. Photos: Tracy Hardy.

This comes after the club appealed to council for a 50 per cent contribution, revealing its 25-year-old tower is an unsafe working environment for lifeguards. It will cover a complete rebuild and, at the very least, see the structure stripped back to its framing.

The balance will come from the club and community-sourced funding.

The club added a cost benefit analysis of the tower which clearly shows that the figures are less than the ongoing remedial costs over the next 12 months.

The $135,000 will help change the layout of the emergency management medical and administrative support facilities, as these would no longer be fit for purpose once new health and safety regulations came into force.

Tauranga Mayor Stuart Crosby says the city is known as a beach area and council needs throw its support behind the 'critical” upgrade given the countless hours lifesavers give on the beach and around Mauao.

'I think it would be enough in the wider scale of our budget,” says Stuart. 'It's a moderate amount but I know the benefits would be huge.”

Deputy Mayor Kelvin Clout agrees, saying Mount Main Beach and Mauao are iconic for the city and this support is only going to be well received by the community.

Council's contribution will help fund a package of changes to the clubhouse, the tower and emergency room, as well as building an operations room to deliver the integrated support required for co-ordinating both ocean and land-based rescues in 2016.

This would provide an area for the search and rescue incident management team, separate to the main hall used for search and rescue operations.

It is a need that was well-highlighted during the search and rescue efforts when five-year-old Jack Dixon was swept out to sea last October.

Councillor John Robson reminds people that though the surf club's funding falls under Sports and Recreation submissions, it must be contextualised in terms of what the service offers to the community.

He says the contribution isn't helping fund paddleboards or financially supporting the members to 'play” their respective sport, but to provide a service.

Councillor Catherine Stewart opposed the funding of $200,000, citing there are other avenues the surf club could approach for funding rather than council.

'I believe that they can get the funding from other charities,” says Catherine. 'It would be nice to see those that use these facilities pay more.”

Tauranga City Council's Long Term Plan deliberations carry on today and Friday.

You may also like....

41 comments

Does Tga have its own Sarah Palin?

Posted on 03-06-2015 10:27 | By BullShtAlert

In my opinion Cr Catherine Stewart's observations that it would be nice to see users paying more, reveal a certain state of thinking or perhaps lack thereof??? Just how do you get the "users" to pay more - meters on the beach perhaps, swipe cards for swimmers? To me this is just more indication of the low standard in the thinking dept of city councillors. Could Cr Catherine Stewart also state specifically which charities will fund the new tower if council funding didn't materialise. Many laugh at the alleged inanities of Sarah Palin. I think we now have our own version right here in Tauranga.


Sorry, Catherine...

Posted on 03-06-2015 12:28 | By morepork

It is never "nice" to see ANYBODY having to pay more. It's this kind of selfish tunnel vision ("I don't use a facility so why should I pay for it?") that undermines community spirit and limits our growth as a City. We are all glad to live here; it follows we should support the icons that draw others here. Besides, the Life Savers are volunteers and deserve the backing of all of us, even if you NEVER swim at the Mount. It is a fact of life that not everybody will play sports or visit the Art Gallery, but if you have a community view, you will be glad those facilities exist for the people who DO want to use them. Only if the load is spread is this achievable. If you don't like sharing or contributing, you probably shouldn't live in a city...


Thanks Catherine

Posted on 03-06-2015 15:16 | By Murray.Guy

Thank you Catherine, in the face of detractors, abusers and users you continue to reject the 'sheep like mentality' of the flock. Cr. Robson is applying his typically spin in suggesting the funding doesn't contribute to the huge variety of critical and not so critical equipment associated with the sport and service. Clearly the focus of the club has not prioritised the regular maintenance and renewals on it's building. Yes, in this instance I support providing ratepayer support, BUT I would certainly be asking that from here on in the club apply due diligence to ALL it's assets and plan for renewals. Fundraising, YES, more innovative and direct methods could be attempted, just not as easy as an elected member and someone else's credit card. Never see the Coastguard folk hitting on the ratepayer?


@Murray Guy

Posted on 03-06-2015 15:52 | By morepork

You criticize them for prioritizing equipment over building maintenance. I reckon those are the correct priorities. Their purpose is to save lives and you should want them to have the best tools available for doing that. I'm sure when they get the new tower they will be doing their best to take care of it; having a ramshackle base, doesn't motivate you to do the maintenance. Yes, they possibly could seek support elsewhere, but I wouldn't mind betting they already did that. As a ratepayer I have no problem with them getting the support they need, even though I don't personally use their service. At least it is a better use of our money than bigger desks and more boondoggles for Councillors...


morepork

Posted on 03-06-2015 15:55 | By YOGI BEAR

User pays is a very good idea, that would mean that all those free loading Aucklanders would pay for it, they benefit from it not virtually all TCC ratepayers. Stephen Town could pay that without even asking anyone, he can spend $20m without asking anyone else but himself.


Neverending tales of woe

Posted on 03-06-2015 15:57 | By CONDOR

CR. STEWART is correct but perhaps not for the right reasons. The excessive total cost of $400k only partly relates to a leaky 9m2 watch tower box cut into the roof a stupid design which has not been properly maintained hence the leaky building scenario.Hope they get it right this time around.


Murray Guy thanks Catherine

Posted on 03-06-2015 16:40 | By Councillorwatch

Not surprising to me that Murray Guy runs to the aid of Cr Catherine Stewart since it is normal for leaders to support their followers and Catherine was first elected under the Pick Six banner if I remember right. I think the lifeguard tower is an obvious choice for ratepayer support and is a much better use of ratepayers funds than the whopping $5 million injection to Baypark and the purchase of a Speedway business that occurred when Murray was a councillor. For me and I guess many ratepayers surflifesaving would take priority over putting money into Baypark, but maybe that wouldn't go down so well with saloon car drivers, eh Murray?


Open your eyes

Posted on 03-06-2015 17:10 | By WaterMad

Councillor Stewart....when was the last time you bothered to take a visit to one of your local Surf Lifesaving Clubs? Yes what they do is in the title...."Surf Life Saving". These volunteers give up hundreds of hours of their time every year to keep the local beaches safe. The same beaches that you Councillor Stewart are responsible for maintaining and keeping safe! As well as the surf patrolling they are constantly looking for avenues to fund the essential equipment required to keep the beaches safe. Yes their is a sport associated to this organisation...."Fitter, faster Lifeguards save lives" is the saying. So don't begrudge them having sport equipment that achieves this result. Show me another sporting organisation that gives back as much as a SLS club does??


BullShtAlert re User Pays

Posted on 03-06-2015 17:13 | By carpedeum

Very simple- there is a locked donation box on the fence where THOUSANDS of people walk past the SurfClub most days.The odd gold coin dropped in there is the answer.


A no brainer actually

Posted on 03-06-2015 18:24 | By BullShtAlert

It's clearly a no brainer that public money should assist the lifesavers and I do note that they are still going to raise the balance. Carpedeum suggests a donation box with the odd gold coin dropped in as the answer. Respectfully there'd need to be a couple of hundred thousand gold coins dropped in and that isn't going to happen. It's good to see a number of commenters calling out Cr Catherine Stewart on her opposition which I think is mean spirited and shows a lack of understanding how a community organisation realistically works. Let's elect intelligent councillors next time.


Councillorwatch continues to lie and Sunlive to print ...

Posted on 03-06-2015 19:40 | By Murray.Guy

Baypark NEVER had an injection of $5 million and NO speedway competitor benefited from any promotion company purchase. The purchase was for the benefit of the Event Centre. Try a little honesty, you'll feel better about yourself and likely nicer to live with (whoever you are).


@Councillorwatch

Posted on 03-06-2015 20:30 | By flipper

Seriously, do we all have to hear it again to know you dislike Murray Guy and Baypark? You are the worst possible broken record, try staying on topic instead of trying to turn it to your pet hates again and again... over it!!!!


Murray Guy vs Councillorwatch

Posted on 03-06-2015 23:02 | By Councillorwatch

Interesting that Murray Guy says that Councillorwatch's claim that Baypark had a cash injection of $5 million is a lie. However it was reported on Sunlive on 27 January 2012 that TCVL, the operators of Baypark, were granted a $5 million dollar injection. Read it for yourselves and determine the truth. It was reported as unanimous so I guess that former Cr Guy voted for it? I also remain outraged that the same council, to my knowledge without public consultation, funded the purchase of a Speedway business for a secret amount. My guess is that secret amount would be far less than the amount rightly granted to surf lifesavers to fix up their tower. At least the lifeguard service has a true public benefit. Sorry if that upsets you Murray.


True

Posted on 04-06-2015 12:25 | By Kenworthlogger

I have just typed in TCVL into the search button at the top of Sun live page and it finds lots of articles about a 5 million bailout. Councilorwatch is quite correct people. Flipper councillors like Murray have wasted public money and must be held accountable. Again another cleanout is required at election time.


The lie

Posted on 05-06-2015 07:10 | By Murray.Guy

The lie Councillorwatch is that NO speedway competitor benefited from ANY Purchase, Infact, is likely just the opposite! ONLY the balance of users at the site. There was NO cash injection. The event centre at Baypark is owned by and built for the wider community. It was transferred to TCVL to manage along with ALL the debt, costing $41m plus, and a mandate to meet the repayments on your behalf. Totally unrealistic! Another Town/Crosby special. Over two years the ratepayer reduced the debt given to TCVL by $5 million. That is NOT a cash injection. I guess you new all this but is just doesn't suit your mischievous mindset.


Thanks True and flipper

Posted on 05-06-2015 11:27 | By Councillorwatch

My purpose in asking Murray Guy the hard questions are to establish the truth, to maintain consistency and to question any possible hypocrisy? So if a councillor or ex councillor rightfully attacks wasteful expenditure I want to make sure they haven't agreed to other wasteful expenditure themselves. Sunlive is great because you can look up history and find what councillors and others have said and done in the past and match it with their claims now. So everytime someone like Murray goes on the criticism path about what they see as waste I'm perfectly entitled to bring up the huge amount of $ that was put into stuff they seemed to approve of. It's called keeping people honest isn't it?


OMG Murray

Posted on 05-06-2015 17:49 | By Kenworthlogger

You said over 2 years the ratepayer reduced the debt by 5 million but it was not a cash injection. What did they use to pay it off with then??? Bannanas??? I can see why you got kicked off council !!! What a wally.


@Yogi Bear

Posted on 06-06-2015 10:37 | By morepork

I take your point, but "those freeloading Aucklanders" actually inject many millions of dollars into our local economy over the Xmas/New Year hols. I know at least two families who rent houses here for the holidays, and spend at least 3 weeks in the area. They dine out in local restaurants and attend local attractions. Mr. Town, just like all of us, is entitled to spend his money however he sees fit... :-)


@Councillorwatch and Murray

Posted on 06-06-2015 10:56 | By morepork

Yes, it is OK to keep elected representatives honest, but it shouldn't become personal and there should be no "cheap shots". ANYONE on Council is going to make good and bad decisions; if the bad ones are continually dredged up it doesn't really achieve much. The topic here is about the SLS funding and the best debates are the ones which stay on topic. ex-Cr Murray and Cr Catherine both seem to be in accord that the SLS doesn't need funding from Council; that's the issue, and, personally, I don't care what happened about the speedway (water under the bridge), but I DO CARE about the attitude from them both. There are places to be thrifty and there are places where public money can be well spent.Knowing the difference may be what keeps a Councillor elected.


examining Murray Guys claims

Posted on 06-06-2015 11:12 | By Councillorwatch

Murray says "The lie Councillorwatch is that NO speedway competitor benefited from ANY Purchase." But Councillorwatch never made any such claim in the first place, so how can that be a lie? Then Murray says "There was NO cash injection." Well just search Sunlive 27 January 2015 and see for yourselves. It will interesting next council election to see who runs. Personally I'll be looking for councillors I can trust, who are consistent and don't use weasel words to try and confuse the public. Thank goodness for Sunlive in the fight for honesty and integrity.


Lifeguards an essential service

Posted on 06-06-2015 13:00 | By Annalist

Reading the comments, the feeling seems to be that of all the demands on ratepayers money, the lifeguard tower is one of the more deserving. I think the argument between Mr Guy and Councillorwatch just highlights how we get all upset about something costing say $150,000 yet some don't blink an eye when Council spends $5 million plus on Baypark and gets into business ventures. I think Cr Catherine Stewart needs to see just how hard the lifeguards work for what little funding they actually get.


Gold plated

Posted on 08-06-2015 12:31 | By YOGI BEAR

At the costs plastered up here it must be lined with gold inside and out. If not then someone got the gold and ran off with it. Who Dunnit this time?


Councillorwatch

Posted on 08-06-2015 23:50 | By YOGI BEAR

You need to understand "Murray Speak", in his mind he is right, but sadly that isn't how it is. In Council (Murray) lingo, when you borrow money by the mega millions and dump it into a dead duck like Baypark that isn't cash at all, because it is borrowed, it is not from rates, it is not from the bank account. The same also applies to where the cash went, it will be snuck into BVL by creating more shares (many millions of them) so as BVL has not debt, only TCC ratepayers have. But none of this counts as "cash" ever. it is all just "clever" funding without affect on ratepayers "ever". But outside of TCC the rest of us all know that is not really the truth now is it. Sooner or later the debt will be added to rates, cos BVL will never be paying EVER!


A

Posted on 09-06-2015 10:42 | By YOGI BEAR

So does that mean they are going to pay rent now for life? Would be a good idea as heaps of money has been spent for little return here. But this is little different to: Hockey, Cricket, Art Gallery, Speedway, Athletics and a few other crazy decisions x TCC that just keep coming out of the place. I guess it is because it is someone else's money?


It's not someone elses

Posted on 09-06-2015 15:34 | By robin bell

money yogi bear. Its your contribution to the society you live in. You simply have to understand you cannot live at no cost. PAY up and get over yourself. Robin Bell.


your contribution?

Posted on 10-06-2015 16:24 | By YOGI BEAR

Like I have a choice? Besides that it is actually public money for general public use on essentials not "nice to haves". It is not my job to work and pay rates so you can have what you want, sorry mate go get a real job.


Your wrong Yogi

Posted on 10-06-2015 20:19 | By robin bell

it is your job to work and contribute.Like it or not its the price we all pay to share this city and all it offers. You have to understand, you are not a special case,you are not entitled to opt out if you disagree. Perhaps you should take your own advise and try somewhere else,I think you'll find it's pretty much the same though. Robin Bell.


Wrong Robin the bell

Posted on 11-06-2015 14:33 | By YOGI BEAR

it is not, but when I do then I expect the money to be spent sensible, wisely and prudently, that clearly is not happening. In fact the spend ups are starting to look as grotesque as a treaty settlement, if that was believable and possible ...


Your choice YOGI.

Posted on 12-06-2015 15:47 | By robin bell

Stay and enjoy the benefits of our city, or leave and go live in the concrete jungle you dream of.Infrastructure as you call it includes places of recreation which cost money,for you that is a sad fact of life,maybe you and kenny can find a desert someplace and build your own. Think about it, you won't be missed. Robin Bell.


No Robin

Posted on 14-06-2015 09:28 | By YOGI BEAR

No one here is saying that there is only to be concrete, that is just yet another excessive exaggeration from you. The problem here is mostly about the unnecessary, wasteful and nonsense that goes on. In end result the costs TCC pay for things is completely ridiculous, the sdecisions made are crazy. None I know you think that is all good, nice and wonderful and quite frankly I am not surprised at your view at all, considering for example that you consider the activities in Wellington to be "acceptable" somehow, et we have not seen or heard anything to prove possible how. All looks the same to you I believe. There in resides the problem for you.


Robin the spin doctor

Posted on 15-06-2015 08:01 | By Kenworthlogger

Funny how i have said and yogi has said we are against blatent money wasting from the council. When you are going broke you stop spending. Robin tries to change what we say to you dont want to be part of society or moan like all you wnat is a concrete city. i cant remember either of us saying that!!! If you can be honest Robin bettter stick to quoting about yourself.


Unnecessary,wasteful,nonsense,

Posted on 15-06-2015 10:30 | By robin bell

are all subjective. I think it highly necessary to cater to the creative potential of our youngsters.How can that be considered wasteful.Perhaps if you had been exposed to a little of this "nonsense" as a child,you would not be part of a subversive group,whose sole aim is to undermine the confidence the rest of us have in our representatives, given we can replace them every three or four years.How's your record so far YOGI BEAR? Robin Bell.


O.K!! Kenny,

Posted on 15-06-2015 12:25 | By robin bell

name one Council or Gov'nt funded project NOT involving your personal view to what constitutes infrasructure,that you have supported. Just one Kenny.You are on record stating Council should be sacked,Kicked out over such expenditure. The problem is if you keep doing that,on the off chance you get better representation,eventually you reach the bottom of the barrel,ending up with you and YOGI. Without areas of recreation kenny (that's re-creation)with safe swimming, safe play areas to stimulate creativity (that's Hairy and friends) we end up with a concrete jungle.No spinning there kenny. Robin Bell.


Ok

Posted on 15-06-2015 18:22 | By Kenworthlogger

How about the Tauranga eastern Link or whatever its called. Much more of the comunity will benifit from that as all the North south traffice wont bung up the access to the city. Or what about sorting out the flooding problems this city has. I bet the kids that live in the houses that get flooded wolud rather have a house that does not fill up with water than hairy maclairy statues. Cant see how if we minimise spending untill we have debt under contol how we get a concrete city. To get a concrete city one would have to spend billions concreteing it up? Why would anyone do that?


creative potential of youngsters?

Posted on 17-06-2015 21:54 | By YOGI BEAR

What has that got to do with TCC and the huge money wasting schemes that they have. PS Robin, my record is perfect, how is yours? last I bothered to count is was 12-0 in my favour. Care for another bout?


What it means YOGI

Posted on 19-06-2015 10:15 | By robin bell

bare is you and your tight fisted friends have to contribute to the greater needs of society,including the welfare of children. Whinge all you like, nothing will change. Robin Bell.


Robin

Posted on 22-06-2015 08:13 | By Kenworthlogger

You are so out of touch with this world. Yogi he looks demolished now. PIty he could never stay on subject....


Out of touch? Kenny

Posted on 22-06-2015 15:35 | By robin bell

well maybe with your world, think of it this way, all of the "things" you and yogi bare are against,all of the "things" we have argued about are actually in existence,with more to come.I really don't think its me that's out of touch,in the real world kenny people use their proper names, and all sorts of other weird things. You should try it sometime soon. Robin Bell.


Robin

Posted on 23-06-2015 16:52 | By Kenworthlogger

Do you think the family that earns less than $400 a week like to keep paying more and more for rates to pay for all this?? Maybe they will go out robbing the Robins to pay for it all.


Kenny,If the family

Posted on 24-06-2015 10:49 | By robin bell

uses the beach I'm sure they don't mind a few dollars a year to contribute to a safer beach,help if one of their children gets injured or lost. I think it's only the highly successful,money grubbing logging truck drivers who grizzle. What say you kenny? Robin Bell.


robin

Posted on 25-06-2015 03:36 | By Kenworthlogger

I am talking about the Hairy statues. I have no problem with the ifeguard towers if you care to read further below. You are so quick to judge. Unfortunatly you cant eat statues when your starving..


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.