Wednesday, May 22, 2013
SunLive - The Bay's news first

On again, off again, on again

Cr Bill Faulkner
Faulkners Corner
www.sunlive.co.nz

The on again, off again Marine Precinct project got yet another kick start at the full council meeting this week.

The marine industry in Tauranga had a 600 tonne slipway facility at Sulphur Point up until about seven years ago. This capital intensive facility had been built by the then Harbour Board in the late sixties to service their tugs and other vessels. When they weren’t using it, other vessels did. It never produced a return on capital as was the nature of local government in those days. And still is today! The 600 tonne slip was demolished to make way for the second harbour bridge and with its demise went a facility that catered for larger (over 35 tonnes) vessels like trawlers through to super yachts.

Council/ratepayers own the waterfront property from Mission Cemetery to Sanford’s fish plant and there is opportunity to put in a new facility, facilitated by council but paid for by the private sector. Expressions of interest are being called for, with a three week window to respond. A successful application would then have three months to work up details before proceeding with an agreed proposal.

Council will now entertain all options, including selling the land, but will be looking to ensure that the local marine industry gets ongoing advantage from it. There is a caveat on the land title precluding residential development and there are existing tenancies. Council had considered selling off other property to help fund a new facility but this failed when a vote was taken, with two elected members absent, 5-4. Property sales if/when made should pay down debt, was the very creditable assertion. So it’s interesting that this argument is applied only when it suits and on other occasions it’s okay to run up more debt.

Take the ongoing upgrade of the northern and southern car park reclamations down town. A taskforce of Larry Baldock, Terry Molloy, Tony Christiansen and Bill Grainger are tasked with recommending to Projects and Monitoring (which comprises all elected members) what is to happen. So it was surprising to receive news that there had been an overspend of $141,000 in the 2011-12 Waterfront Project budget. Larry said it was much needed work that would mean the area wouldn’t have to be done later when a budget would be available. So on a vote of 10-1 (the one being me) the 2012-13 budget was reduced by $49,000 and the remaining $92,000 taken from Transportation and Open Space budget. I voted against on principle that the processes and mechanisms put in place to stop budget overruns had not been adhered to. This sort of overrun was supposed to be a thing of the past.

The Statement of Intent for the Art Gallery was also confirmed, unaltered, from a previous council meeting where it was referred back to the Art Gallery Board of Directors requesting that the Art Gallery “demonstrates a clear pathway of financial sustainability”. Chairman Graeme Horsley socked it to council/ratepayers in a 4 and a ½ page dissertation. Basically the sticking point is that depreciation on the building is required by the Local Government Act to be cash funded. That seems unnecessary as a well maintained building should increase in value. David Stewart expressed his reluctance to approve a forward budget showing deficit and suggested dialogue to arrive at a solution. I agreed but on a vote of 9-2 the unaltered SOI was approved. Terry Molloy and Murray Guy went further and indicated they would support reinstatement of automatic CPI increase on the ratepayer subsidy of around $850,000 to help them out. I note that this week there was a move afoot at the Auckland Art Gallery to scale back the director’s role and put more focus on making money, which was “met with gasps of horror in a small but powerful group of arts patrons”.

Next week council will be deliberating on its annual/three year/10 year plan and central government is telling councils to keep rates to the level of inflation. That’s what most of Tauranga’s elected members say, when it crops up, but then vote more expense when that crops up too. Just how this all works will be decided next week. I mean, pay for this, pay for that, hold rates? Something is missing here. No increases for councillors pay this year from the Government Remuneration Authority but the Mayor goes up by $4600 to $136,700. Deputy Mayor remains at $84,232.66, chairman $81,226.15, and councillors $74,171.15. Mayor Stuart Crosby said he wouldn’t be seeking a replacement to the mayoral car (Honda Accord) and would be providing his own car. The annual running cost is $17,915 which included $6780 depreciation and $4780 fringe benefit tax. For formal occasions City Hall rents flash cars. This doesn’t happen often.

Some Baywave Gym equipment will be replaced/upgraded at a cost of $286,283. This is funded out of the depreciation account. Baywave/TCAL accounting figures are confidential but I can say that the gym contributes significantly to reducing ratepayer subsidy to the aquatic network. Baywave Gym (Clubfit) is focusing on retention of members and improving service to them and in the face of a yet to be decided future direction for TCAL, it is prudent to keep the business up to scratch.

 

This week’s mind bender from Oscar Wilde – True friends stab you in the front!


 

Comments

UNFATHOMABLE.. but

Posted on 29-05-2012 20:03 | By EYESPY

Analyse this then > from John Cleese a final thought - "Greece is collapsing the Iranians (Persians)are getting aggressive and Rome is in disarray.Welcome back to 430BC!! BE warned the Tsunami is coming.ENJOY.

OK MURRAY

Posted on 28-05-2012 00:53 | By PLONKER

Sell everything, now will be fine.

MURRAY \

Posted on 27-05-2012 13:21 | By TERMITE

That besdies teh botched decision to buy Baypark in the first place that was to include the speedway that the other complete and utter related blunders was to: - even think about it, to build TECT Arena and lastly to have built TECT Arena at Baypark anyway.

Ok Murray, sell Speedway, then the gym and other activities

Posted on 27-05-2012 09:56 | By Phailed

The Speedway could be sold immediately to "reduce debt and maintain an income stream." Just the same as the gym business. But I’m not sure your Council would be any good at buying and selling businesses. Based on what you state about Speedway you should also say "Now that TCAL own the gym business they can ensure maximum benefit is achieved for all assets on the Baywave site." Lots of spin and not much consistency. I think Council should be out of gyms, speedway and all the other things quite capable of private operation

Phailed, philosophy, not figures

Posted on 27-05-2012 08:09 | By murray.guy

Council should avoid if possible the ownership and operation of activities that either belong to the ’private sector’ or could be. I supported the purchase of the ’speedway business’ for a few of reasons. The agreement with the speedway business (Baypark Speedway Promotions) was as flawed as the purchase process off Bob Clarkson. Steven Town (former CEO responsible) had left behind an expensive mess, and urgent and critical steps were required to mitigate the negative impacts and risks. Now that TCVL own the speedway business they can ensure maximum benefit is achieved for all assets on the Baypark site, not the least being TECT Arena. Ownership of the speedway business better positions TCVL to ensure all activities are complimentary. TCVL now understand the ’business of speedway’ and are better positioned to secure a sale of that business on terms that do not have a negative impact on either the fiscal or operational aspects of Baypark as a whole. I have already indicated within Council that the sale of ’speedway activities’ to an external promotion should now be investigated, with a sale achieved no later than the conclusion of the next speedway. season. The potential to generate profit is not in itself a valid reason for Council to own and operate a business that can be successfully achieved by the private sector.

Can\'t understand Murray Guy\'s comment

Posted on 25-05-2012 23:26 | By Phailed

Murray, why do you advocate investigating selling a gym business attached to an aquatic centre? Only recently you seemed to support council buying a Speedway business attached to Baypark Stadium? Can you give us the figures behind your reasoning? Is one activity of more interest to you?

GYM BUSINESS

Posted on 25-05-2012 18:42 | By Ian Stevenson

Bill is not telling the truth here, the gym businesses run by TCAL can not and do not make any money. Even former CEO Stephen Town certified in writing that "We believe the gyms make a cash surplus ... but we have no information to prove it." Now we know TCAL has monthly reports and we also know that Councillors have never been allowed to see them. Only Deputy Mayor David Stewart as a director of TCAL has been able to do so. Former CEO Town also confirmed that the revenue for Baywave is all allocated to the gym part and all the costs are added to the Pool part (to ensure the maximum ’subsidy’ from ratepayers). The gym members get free access to the pools but there is no split in membership fees neither to the pools nor of the costs of the pools to the gym activity. The reported results are then complete rubbish as they do not reflect what really is happening. At the end of it all anyone looking at the results is being deliberately misled and deceived for the single purpose of growing the thing into to something bigger. The bigger it is the more it costs ratepayers. Then there is more...

MARINE \'PARADE\'

Posted on 25-05-2012 17:17 | By PLONKER

That is Bill’s hobby horse for sure, been banging on about it for years, if it was of any use to anyone and profitable then the private sector would have already built a new one decades ago. So as that did not happen means it is a for sure loss maker so perfect for TCC to get involved in it ASAP, throw ratepayers money at then hope like hell that more is not needed, a bit like all the other activities of TCC, more money wuill be needed each year, like the Art Gallery ... here we go again! When do they ever learn?

Incorrect again ...

Posted on 25-05-2012 15:39 | By murray.guy

" ... Murray Guy went further and indicated they would support reinstatement of automatic CPI increase on the ratepayer subsidy of around $850,000 to help them out." Stick, to what you know to be the truth Bill. This is incorrect. Bill, you forgot to tell your readers I was a lonely voice advocating investigating the sale of the gym business to reduce debt and maintain an income stream.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to make a comment.
Latest Blogs
©2013 Sun Media Ltd - All Rights Reserved
Sun Media